The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The next prisoner was one who, for a long period, was closely connected
with Monsieur, the father of the duchess. Claude de Bourdeille, count de
Montresor, was born about 1608, and was a grand-nephew of that pleasant
but unscrupulous writer Brantome, who bequeathed to him his mansion of
Richemont. Montresor was early admitted into the train of the duke of
Orleans, and at length became his confidential friend, whom he consulted
on all occasions. He availed himself of his influence to keep at a
distance from the duke all the friends of Richelieu, to incite him still
more against that minister, and to link him in confederacy with the count
of Soissons. In 1636, he went much further. In conjunction with Saint
Ibal and others, he formed a plan for assassinating the cardinal, and to
this plan the duke and the count gave their assent. The murder was to
be perpetrated as the minister was leaving the council chamber; Saint
Ibal was behind him, ready to strike the blow, and waited only for an
affirmative sign from the duke; but at this critical moment, either the
courage of Orleans gave way, or his conscience smote him, for he turned
away his head, and hurried from the spot. The cardinal consequently
escaped.
While Montresor was subsequently busy in Guyenne, labouring to induce the
duke of Epernon and his son to take up arms for Monsieur, he was suddenly
abandoned by his employer, who made his own peace with Richelieu.
Montresor now retired to his estate, where, for more than five years,
he lived in the utmost privacy. He had, however, secret interviews with
Monsieur, and, at his solicitation, he engaged in the conspiracy of Cinq
Mars. Again he was deserted by him, and more disgracefully than in the
first instance; for the dishonourable prince did not scruple to disavow
the proceedings of his agent, and to aver that Cinq Mars and Montresor
were the persons who had misled him. Montresor would have ascended the
scaffold with Cinq Mars and de Thou, had he not prudently taken refuge in
England, whence he did not return till the cardinal was no more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account