The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
cannon shots have killed her husband.”
Four months did not pass away before, tired of wasting their lives and
properties in a contest which could benefit only the privileged classes,
the Parisians invited the king to return to his capital. The monarch
entered it on the 21st of October, 1652. The faction of the Fronde was
annihilated, and its leaders were scattered in all directions; their
vanity, selfishness, and utter want of principle and patriotism,
deserved such a fate. Had they been animated by noble motives, had they
possessed even a moderate share of wisdom and virtue, they might have
laid the groundwork of a stable and beneficent government, and thereby
saved their country from innumerable immediate and remote evils. But
“The sensual and the base rebel in vain,
Slaves by their own compulsion!”
As soon as the king had entered Paris, the Bastile was summoned, and La
Louvière was informed that, if he were rash enough to stand a siege, the
gibbet would be his portion. Too prudent to run so useless and formidable
a risk, he readily gave up his charge. From the moment when Mademoiselle
directed its fire upon the king’s troops, a hundred and thirty-seven
years elapsed before the Bastile again heard the roar of artillery fired
in anger.
One of the first acts of Louis XIV. was to hold a bed of justice, in
which he ordered the registration of an edict to abridge the power of
the parliament. By this edict, the parliament was strictly prohibited
from deliberating on state and financial affairs, and instituting any
proceedings whatever against the ministers whom he might be pleased
to employ. Louis was then only a boy of fourteen, and this act was of
course the work of Mazarin; but, young as he was, the monarch was already
thoroughly imbued with the principles on which it was framed. Three
years afterwards he gave a striking proof of this. The parliament having
ventured to manifest a faint opposition to some of his many oppressive
fiscal edicts, he took a step which showed how deeply despotism was
ingrained into his character. He was engaged in the chase, at Vincennes,
when information was brought to him that his will was disputed. Hurrying
back to Paris, he entered the parliament chamber, the sanctuary of
justice, booted, spurred, whip in hand, and thus addressed the assembly
of venerable magistrates: “Sirs, everybody knows the calamities which
the meetings of the parliament have produced. I will henceforth prevent
those meetings. I order you, therefore, to desist from those which you
have begun, with respect to the edicts which, in my late bed of justice,
I directed to be registered. You, Mr. First President, I forbid to allow
of these assemblies; and I forbid every one of you to demand them.”
Having thus spoken he departed, leaving his hearers in astonishment. He
was then a beardless youth, who had not reached his seventeenth year. The
members of the parliament might well have called to mind the words of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account