The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The trite proverb, that “two of a trade cannot agree,” was verified by
Desmarets; he resolved to destroy the man who dared to make pretensions
that eclipsed his own. To effect his purpose, he acted with the cunning
of a lunatic, and the dark-heartedness of a fiend. By paying assiduous
court to Morin, by pretending to be one of his most submissive disciples,
and even by going so far as to write him a letter, unequivocally
recognising him as the Son of Man, he contrived to insinuate himself into
the confidence of his unfortunate victim, and to draw from him his most
secret thoughts. In the course of their conversations, Morin is said to
have declared, among other things, that unless the king acknowledged
his mission he would die. Having thus furnished himself with evidence
against the man whom he had deluded, Desmarets hastened to denounce him
as a heretic and traitor. Orders were issued for arresting Morin, who
was found engaged in copying out a “Discourse to the King,” which began
with “the Son of Man to the King of France.” He was brought to trial, and
was sentenced to be burned alive. Some of his followers were condemned
to whipping and the galleys. The iniquitous judgment passed on Morin was
executed on the 14th of March, 1663. At the stake his reason seems to
have returned; he repeatedly called on the Saviour and the Virgin, and
humbly prayed for mercy to the Creator of all things.
Little commiseration is due to him whose imprisonment is next recorded;
his baseness met with deserved punishment. Francis René Crispin du Bec,
Marquis of Vardes, was of a good family, and served with reputation in
Flanders, France, Italy, and Spain. During the war of the Fronde, he was
constant to the royal party; and it was doubtless his zeal and fidelity
on this occasion which acquired for him the friendship of Louis XIV. He
rose to high rank in the army; was made captain-colonel of the Hundred
Swiss in 1655; and, next year, succeeded the Duke of Orleans in the
government of Aigues-Mortes, and was invested with the various orders of
knighthood. He was on the point of being created a duke and peer, when
the discovery of a dishonourable act of which he had been guilty, stopped
his promotion, and deprived him of his liberty. Louis had chosen Vardes
as his friend, and had confided to him his passion for the celebrated
Mlle. de la Vallière, who was one of the maids of honour to the Duchess
of Orleans. It appears that the duchess and her friend, the Countess of
Soissons, and their lovers, the Count de Guiche and Vardes, had hoped,
by means of La Vallière, to obtain a predominant influence over Louis.
But the royal mistress loved Louis with a sincere and disinterested
affection, and was not disposed to become the instrument of court
intriguers. It was resolved, therefore, to oust her, and substitute in
her stead Mlle. de la Mothe Houdancourt, who, it was imagined, would
be more subservient. To effect this object, Vardes wrote a letter,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account