The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The severe example which was made of de Bouteville, in the reign of Louis
XIII., though it gave a temporary check to the practice of duelling,
was far from putting an end to it. Nor did better success attend the
ordinances issued in 1634 by Louis XIII., and in 1643, 1651, and 1670,
by Louis XIV. The feebleness of the royal authority, during a disturbed
regency, and the war of the Fronde, with the quarrels arising out of it,
doubtless tended to neutralize the laws. But, even when Louis XIV. was
in uncontested possession of despotic power, we find that the murderous
custom of fighting in parties was still existing. In 1663, a famous duel
took place between the two La Frettes, Saint Aignan, and Argenlieu,
on the one side, and Chalais, Noirmoutier, d’Antin, and Flamarens, on
the other. The axe was at length laid to the root of the evil, by the
edict of August 1679, which constituted the marshals of France, and the
governors of provinces, supreme judges in all cases where individuals
supposed their honour to have been wounded. This edict prohibited,
under the heaviest penalties, all private combats and rencounters, both
within and without the kingdom. One clause seems excellently calculated
to produce its intended effect, no less by the insinuation with which
it opens, than by the denunciations with which it concludes. “Those,”
it says, “who, doubting of their own courage, shall have called in the
aid of seconds, thirds, or a greater number of persons, shall, besides
the punishment of death and confiscation, be degraded from their
nobility, and have their coat of arms publicly blackened and broken by
the hangman; their successors shall be obliged to adopt new arms; and
the seconds, thirds, and other accomplices, shall be punished in the
same manner.” This salutary edict appears to have nearly accomplished
the purpose for which it was framed. The slavish fear of incurring the
displeasure of the sovereign, a feeling which was so prevalent among the
courtiers of Louis XIV., perhaps aided materially in producing obedience
to the law. It would have been well if a worse effect had never resulted
from that kind of fear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account