The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The money thus obtained was lavishly spent on the pomps and amusements of
the court. A part was dissipated at the gaming-table; Louis being then
a constant and an unlucky gamester. Theatrical entertainments absorbed
another portion. The getting up of a single grand ballet is said to
have cost no less than forty thousand pounds. Guy Patin had reason to
exclaim, “they talk much at the Louvre of balls, ballets, and rejoicings,
but nothing is said of relieving the people, who are dying of such
unexampled want, after so great and solemn a general peace has been
concluded. O pudor! ô mores! ô tempora!”
But though, in his private letters, Patin could venture to censure
profusion and exaction, he would soon have been fitted with what he
somewhere calls “a stone doublet,” had he dared to breathe a word
against them in public. It was dangerous even for a barrister to perform
faithfully his duty to a client. M. Burai, an eminent advocate, was
committed to the Bastile, in 1655, for having undertaken the defence of
Guenegaut, one of the treasurers, who was prosecuted by the government.
The press was completely muzzled. We find De Prez, a printer, sent to
the Bastile, for having printed a letter by the Bishop of Aleth, which
displeased the jesuits; a second unlucky typographer, for offending the
Archbishop of Paris; and a third, named Coquier, for privately printing
an answer to a work of the Chevalier Talon, who had attacked Coquier’s
former master, the superintendant Fouquet. It was a perilous task for
a man to defend himself against the minions of favour. The Journal des
Sçavans having abused Charles Patin, he was about to reply, when it was
intimated to him that if he did not desist, the Bastile would receive
him: the journal happened to be protected by M. Colbert, the minister.
Such protection gave a decisive advantage over a less fortunate rival.
The conduct of Renaudot, the printer of the Gazette, affords a strong
proof of the tyrannical use which was made of it. There appears to have
been at this period a sort of partnership, the members of which gained a
livelihood by compiling and vending a manuscript gazette. As the sale of
this paper diminished that of his own, Renaudot made a bold attempt to
get rid of his competitors. He is said to have been extremely desirous
that they should be hanged; but his benevolent wish was not gratified.
He had, however, the satisfaction of procuring seven of them to be sent
to the Bastile, one of whom was publicly whipped through the streets.
Yet these measures, harsh as they were, did not succeed in putting down
the manuscript gazetteers; for, five years afterwards, six more of them
were committed to prison. From its long continuance, and the risks which
the traders were willing to encounter, we may infer that the trade was
productive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account