The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
When the Duke of Orleans assumed the regency, the finances of the kingdom
were in a lamentable state. The protracted and expensive wars into which
Louis XIV. had wantonly plunged, the boundless extravagance in which he
had indulged, and the peculations, and wasteful expenditure of every
kind, which had so long prevailed, had not only drained the treasury, but
had also caused a heavy load of debt, and almost dried up the sources of
supply. The government was indebted to an enormous amount, the revenue
of three years had been anticipated, and public credit was destroyed.
From all quarters a loud cry was raised for fiscal reform. A national
bankruptcy was proposed in the council, but the proposal was unanimously
rejected. The means which were adopted in its stead were, however,
scarcely less unjust; they were the same clumsy and violent means which
former rulers had almost uniformly employed. Contracts, entered into by
the ministers of the late king, were capriciously annulled, annuities and
pensions were cut down to one half, offices, which the holders had bought
at a great price, were abolished without any compensation being given,
a new coinage was issued at a higher nominal value, and government
securities, to the amount of six hundred millions, were at one stroke
reduced to two hundred and fifty millions, and even of this diminished
sum the creditors were defrauded of more than a fifth part. But the grand
panacea, for restoring the consumptive exchequer to its pristine vigour,
was the establishment of a court, antithetically denominated a chamber of
justice. This chamber was directed to institute a rigorous inquiry into
the conduct of all persons who had any connection with the finances, or
with contracts of any kind, and compel them to disgorge their spoil. A
sweeping edict brought under the jurisdiction of this inquisitorial body
several thousands of individuals, from the richest farmer-general, or
contractor, down to the poorest clerk. “The custom,” says Lemontey, “of
drawing back by proscriptions the rapines which a vicious administration
has tolerated, is an Asiatic art which ill beseems regular governments.
But, condemned to a financial anarchy by its squandering habits,
France, for a long while, could find no other than this odious remedy.”
The remedy was indeed an odious one! The retrospective operation of
this edict extended as far back as seven-and-twenty years; so that it
clutched in its iron grasp not only living presumed criminals, but
the children, grandchildren, and relations of those who had ceased to
exist, and thus at once inflicted torment on a multitude of guiltless
victims, and shook property to its very basis. The means employed to
give effect to the edict were of the most base and barbarous kind.
Death was the penalty denounced against all who were convicted, whoever
made an incorrect declaration of his fortune was doomed to the galleys,
and, that there might be no lack of evidence, the pillory was held up
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account