The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The preparations of the king at length made St. Pol fully aware of his
danger. Hesitating as to the measure which in this emergency he ought
to adopt, he for a moment half resolved to stand on his defence; but
reflection on the superior resources of his enemy persuaded him that
he had no chance of success from arms. Yet, had he boldly appealed to
the sword, he might, perhaps, have saved his life, or at least have met
with an honourable death. He preferred throwing himself on the duke of
Burgundy, whom he tempted by offering him his strong towns, as the price
of protection. Louis demanded that he should be given up to him; and
after some qualms of conscience as to sacrificing a suppliant, who was
also his cousin, Charles of Burgundy complied with the demand. St. Pol
was conveyed to the Bastile. The French monarch gave him his choice,
either to make a full confession, or to be tried in the customary manner.
The latter alternative was chosen by the prisoner, who knew not that his
letters, to Edward and the duke of Burgundy, were in the king’s hands,
and therefore believed that there was not legal evidence to warrant
his conviction. His judges sentenced him to lose his head, and he was
executed on the 19th of December, 1475.
The last captive in the Bastile, during the reign of Louis the Eleventh,
or rather the last of whom any record remains—for there were doubtless
numbers of the nameless throng—was an Armagnac; a name which seems to
have been fatal to its owners. We have seen one Armagnac torn in pieces
by the populace, another treacherously slain after the surrender of his
stronghold, a third losing his reason in a dungeon, and we are now to
witness the leading of a fourth to the scaffold, under circumstances the
most horrible.
James of Armagnac, duke of Nemours, was the son of the Count de la
Marche, who was the governor of the youthful dauphin. When the pupil of
the count ascended the throne, he gave his cousin Louisa in marriage to
James of Armagnac, and conferred on him the dukedom of Nemours, with
all the rights and privileges of the peerage; an honour which had never
before been enjoyed by any other than princes of the royal family.
Nemours, nevertheless, joined the League of the Public Good. Louis, as we
have seen, was obliged to succumb to the League; and, by the consequent
peace of Conflans, James of Armagnac obtained the government of Paris and
the Isle of France.
Little more than three years elapsed before Nemours was again engaged
in intrigues against the monarch. But the time was gone by when revolt
could lead to promotion. Louis had strengthened his authority, and he
was not disposed to see it set at nought. He, however, pardoned him; but
it was on condition that any future offence should render him liable
to punishment for the past, and that he should then be deprived of his
privilege of peerage, and be tried as a private individual.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account