The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
live to recover his freedom. Worn out by a life of dissipation, he died,
in his thirty-eighth year, at the Tournelles, to which prison he had been
removed from the Bastile.
The decease of Vendôme took place in 1560, and, for several years, with
the exception of a duke of Lunebourg, who was imprisoned for a quarrel
with the duke of Guise, no prisoner, at least none whose fate history has
thought worthy of recording, appears to have found an abode within the
walls of the Bastile. After the horrible massacre of St. Bartholomew,
there was a moment when the fortress seemed about to receive a princely
captive. The king of Navarre (afterwards Henry IV.) had yielded to the
threats of the royal murderer, and had changed his religion; but the
Prince of Condé was made of sterner stuff. He resisted so firmly all
attempts to induce him to apostatize, that Charles IX. ordered him to
be brought before him, and, in a furious tone, addressed to him three
ominous words; “The mass, death, or the Bastile.” Condé held out a little
longer, but he yielded when he found that du Rosier, a famous protestant
minister, had been converted to the Catholic faith.
It was not till towards the close of the reign of Charles IX. that the
Bastile was again tenanted. That monarch was then sinking rapidly into
the grave, under the pressure of bodily disease, and the perpetual stings
of his conscience. Haunted by appalling dreams, and by direful spectres
and dismal sounds, which his fancy incessantly conjured up, he had fallen
into a state which scarcely the remembrance of his crimes can prevent
us from pitying. It was at this period that the party was formed which
adopted the appellations of Politicians and Malecontents. The first of
these names was chosen to show that the persons assuming it were not
actuated, like the protestants, by religious motives. The oppressive
weight of the taxes, the insolent licentiousness of the soldiery, and the
cruelty and flagrant incapacity of those who managed the public affairs,
were their grounds of complaint. At the head of this party, which soon
became considerable, were William de Montmorenci and his nephew, the
Viscount de Turenne. Though this party consisted of catholics, yet, as
among the objects which it sought to obtain there were many which the
protestants no less eagerly desired, it was not long before a coalition
was formed between them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account