The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
On his taking possession of the throne, Henry set at liberty the king
of Navarre and the duke of Alençon. The marshals, however, were still
retained in confinement. Diana, the wife of Montmorenci, had adopted
a singular mode of moving in her husband’s behalf the feelings of the
monarch. Dressed in deep mourning, and followed by all her female
attendants in the same garb, she met Henry as he was passing through the
street, fell at his feet, and entreated him to take compassion on her
husband, whose health was declining in a prison, into which he had been
thrown without being convicted, or so much as accused, of any crime.
She likewise forcibly urged that, even if his majesty supposed him to
be guilty, he ought to grant him a fair trial. The king seemed to be
affected by her appeal, which was backed by some of the nobles who were
present, and he promised to enquire into the business with as little
delay as possible.
The promise of the king, however, if sincere at the moment, was soon
disregarded. Cossé, who, like his fellow captive, was suffering from bad
health, was, indeed, allowed to take up his abode in his own house, under
a guard; but the only deliverance which was destined for Montmorenci was
deliverance from all the troubles of this world. It appears, in fact,
that his life would not have been safe for a moment, but for the salutary
fear that his death would drive into open hostility his brother Damville,
who held the government of Languedoc. A report having been spread that
Damville was dead, the king resolved to have the marshal strangled in
prison, and, as a preliminary step, it was industriously given out that
he was subject to apoplectic attacks. This barbarous and cowardly scheme
would have been carried into effect, had not an obstacle occurred. Giles
de Souvré, who had been mistakenly selected to perform the assassin’s
part, chanced to be a more honest man than his royal master, and he
purposely interposed so many delays, that time was afforded to ascertain
the falsehood of the report which had announced the death of Damville.
It was neither to the clemency nor the justice of his sovereign that
Montmorenci was ultimately indebted for the recovery of his freedom.
Endangered by the betrayal of a plot into which he had entered against
his brother, Alençon mustered up courage enough to run away. His flight
took place on the 16th of September 1575. As soon as he was in safety, at
Dreux, he issued a manifesto, not unartfully contrived, to gain partisans
in various quarters. Reform in every department was the tempting burden
of its song. It worked its intended effect; the protestants were in
raptures, the Third Party was satisfied with it, and he speedily found
himself in a situation to set the court at defiance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account