The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
This disclosure was of too much importance to Henry of France to admit of
delay in making it known to him. The duke of Anjou accordingly despatched
one of his chamberlains to Paris, with the depositions, and a letter, in
which the Guises were not spared. At first, Henry was startled at the
seeming danger; but his natural dislike of business, and his love of
pleasure, soon induced him to take refuge in the idea that the whole was
an invention of some one who wished to disturb his quiet, or a stratagem
of his brother, to obtain liberal succours. Not so thought his minister
Bellièvre, in whom he placed great confidence. While the minister perused
the paper, the changes in his countenance plainly showed that he thought
the plot was real, and the peril from it extreme. It was at length
settled, that Bellièvre, accompanied by Brulart, one of the secretaries
of state, should proceed to Bruges, interrogate Salcede, and require
that the criminal should be transferred to Paris. “If,” said the king,
“my brother consents to the transfer, I shall believe that a conspiracy
exists.”
When Bellièvre questioned him, Salcede, for the third time, repeated
his story. He was now conveyed to France, and placed in the castle of
Vincennes; the duke of Anjou having readily acceded to the wish of his
brother. When, however, he was brought before the king in council,
he disavowed all that he had previously said. His confession had, he
affirmed, been dictated to him by three persons in the duke’s service,
who compelled him to write it. “Why, then, did you say the same to
Bellièvre, when those persons were absent?” inquired the king. To this
the unblushing prisoner answered, that Bellièvre had intimidated him by
threats, and that he had always been under the influence of terror while
he was in the ducal palace. Bellièvre was a man remarkable for patience
and politeness, but he was so provoked by this charge, that he could not
forbear from exclaiming, “You are an impudent slanderer.” At the close of
the examination, Salcede was removed to the Bastile. There he was again
examined, and there he persisted in his disavowal.
It now became a question what should be done with Salcede. The president
de Thou advised that he should be retained in prison. He urged that, if
the conspiracy were real, his detention would intimidate his accomplices,
and afford the means of convicting them in case of need; while, on the
other hand, if the conspiracy were only a calumny, invented by turbulent
and ill-disposed persons, the existence of the criminal might serve
to justify the innocence of those whom he had accused. His son, the
celebrated historian, tells us, that the president had an additional
motive in thus advising; he wished not merely to hold the conspirators
in check, by preserving the evidence of their guilt, but, at the same
time, to keep before the king’s eyes a memento of the danger to which
he exposed himself by his unbridled licentiousness, and his oppressive
misgovernment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account