The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Francis le Breton, to whom I have already alluded, affords a striking
proof that, when Henry the third forbore to punish, it was not clemency,
but fear, indolence, or caprice, that withheld his hand. Le Breton was a
barrister of Poitiers, who had acquired considerable reputation by his
forensic talents. It speaks strongly in favour of his honesty and the
kindness of his nature, that he espoused so warmly the part of those for
whom he pleaded, as entirely to identify their interest with his own. A
mere mercenary counsel, indifferent to the justice or injustice of his
client’s claim, could have had no such feelings. Unfortunately, le Breton
was of a family in which symptoms of insanity had often appeared, and the
dreadful malady was lurking in his brain. The loss of a cause, in which
he was engaged for a poor individual, at once roused the latent disease
into action. He burst into vehement invectives against the judges, and
presented a violent memorial against them to a higher tribunal. The
superior judges, who saw how he was affected, gave him a gentle rebuke,
and dismissed the complaint. Irritated by this, he journeyed to Paris,
to make an appeal to the king. Having fastened his memorial on the
end of a stick, he went to the Louvre, where the guards, who rightly
concluded that he was bereft of his senses, endeavoured to drive him
away. Le Breton, however, was immovable, and he exclaimed so loudly and
incessantly, “The cause of the poor is abandoned, and God will take
vengeance for it,” that the noise reached the king’s ear, and he ordered
him to be admitted. Henry listened to his story, and then commanded him
to return to his own country, and to keep silence in public. To have
sent him to the hospital would have been a more praiseworthy act.
Instead of proceeding to Poitiers, the maniac wandered through the
provinces, calling on the people to recover their liberty, and sending
inflammatory writings to the towns which were too distant for him to
visit. At last he reached Bordeaux, and demanded an interview with the
duke of Mayenne. It was granted; and the unfortunate lunatic employed
the whole of it in conjuring the duke to defend the cause of the poor.
Mayenne, who felt that le Breton’s harangues to the multitude, mad as he
was, might be serviceable to the Guises, gave him money, and probably
hopes, and then desired him to withdraw.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account