The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Gillot, the last of those whom I have mentioned as having been lodged
in the Bastile by Bussi le Clerc, was certainly entitled to share the
fate of his companions, his attachment to the royal cause being a matter
of notoriety. He was of a noble Burgundian family, possessed a good
fortune, much erudition, and a valuable library, was connected with most
of the wits and learned men of that period, and assembled them frequently
at his social board, where they conversed on topics of philosophy and
literature. He had also the higher merit of being beneficent, sincere,
and candid. It was said of him, that he had so benign a disposition that
his sole delight was in obliging. Gillot was educated for the church,
and became dean of Langres, and canon of the Holy Chapel at Paris; he
was likewise one of the ecclesiastical counsellors, or judges, in the
parliament. His abode in the Bastile does not appear to have been of long
duration; it is probable that he ransomed himself. For his incarceration
he took an ample revenge, by bearing a part in writing the admirable
satire called “la Satire Ménippée, ou le Catholicon d’Espagne,” which
covered the Leaguers with ineffaceable ridicule, and is said to have been
more injurious to their cause than the sword of Henry the fourth. The
harangue of the legate at the opening of the states of the League, and
the laughable idea of the procession of the Leaguers, are attributed to
Gillot. This estimable and talented man died in 1619.
The Council of Sixteen, like the Common Council of Paris in 1792 and
1793, was eager to monopolize all the power of the state. It carried on
a secret correspondence with the Pope and the Spanish monarch, and was
obviously preparing to subvert the authority of the duke of Mayenne.
In furtherance of its plan, it resolved to strike the parliament with
terror, and of course render that body subservient, by a decisive blow.
A pretext was furnished by the acquittal of a person named Brigard,
who had been tried on a charge of corresponding with the royalists.
A cry was immediately raised, that the parliament had violated its
duty, by granting impunity to treason, and that some measure must be
adopted, to prevent the recurrence of such a crime. Several meetings
were clandestinely held, to decide upon what should be done. The result
was, that on the 15th of November, 1591, the president Brisson, and the
counsellors Larcher and Tardif, were seized by order of the Sixteen,
carried to prison, and hanged there upon a beam, without even the
semblance of a trial. The bodies, with calumnious papers attached to
them, were then removed to the Grêve, and publicly exposed on three
gibbets.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account