The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
The Confederate victory at Manassas, by reason of its completeness and
still more by reason of its spectacular accompaniments, gave peculiar
force to all these arguments in favor of that European recognition of
Southern independence which must have threatened the final disruption
of the American Union, the breaking down of the most dangerous trade
rival of those countries, the opening of the South to absolute free
trade, with a distinct preference for English, French and German over
"Yankee" goods, and the political weakening of that growing impulse to
republicanism which resided in the glory and greatness of the American
Republic. To dissolve and destroy the Union would have been once and
for all time to make an end of the most potent influence that ever
existed on earth in behalf of a "world without kings, and a people
supreme."
When the battle of Manassas was done, and McDowell's army had fled
in panic as a disorganized mob into Washington, and was manifestly
prepared to flee farther if it should be pressed with vigor, as every
foreign observer expected that it would be, there was every inducement
and every excuse for the recognition of the Southern Confederacy by
European nations, and for their demand that the still ineffective
blockade should be raised as an unjustifiable interference with
international commerce. Such action on the part of France and England
would undoubtedly have precipitated war between those countries and
the United States, and in that war, knowing as we do the relations
then existing between European nations, Austria, Italy and Prussia
would very probably have joined. What the consequences would have been
each reader must judge for himself, but at the very least it may be
said with entire safety that such a circumstance would have added very
greatly to the embarrassment of the United States Government, and to
the chances of ultimate success on the part of the South.
The pretender who sat at that time upon the fraud-buttressed throne
of France and called himself "Napoleon III" was ready and eager for
such interference. But he dared not undertake it single handed. He
sought the alliance and aid of England, and without doubt he would have
secured both but for one fact. Whatever policies an English government
may favor, there is always behind that government, as its master, the
sentiment of the British people, and that sentiment was at that time
unalterably and implacably hostile to human slavery.
It was the misfortune of the South that its contention for its own
right of self-government was inseparably linked in the minds of men
abroad with the cause of human bondage, against which British public
sentiment revolted.
Great Britain is not a republic in our sense of the word, but under all
its forms of monarchy, and with all its embarrassments of aristocratic
privilege, its people actually and absolutely rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account