The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
If that could have been completely done, the war must of necessity have
come to an early and merciful end. And there is no doubt that it might
have been done during the first years of the struggle if practical
common sense had been reinforced by executive ability commensurate
with the demands of the occasion. As a matter of fact this was never
completely accomplished until the war was in its last throes. To the
very end the Confederate soldiers were clad in English-made cloth, shod
with English-tanned leather, and largely fed upon Cincinnati bacon and
corned beef which had been shipped to Nassau in the Bahamas and thence
carried into Confederate ports by the daring of the English captains
and the English crews of English-built and English-owned blockade
running steamers. Very naturally the Federal Government understood and
appreciated all these conditions, and very naturally it sought to take
advantage of them by blockading Southern ports and thus preventing or
at least embarrassing those importations upon which the South must
mainly depend for its powder, its bullets, its clothing, its shoes, its
arms and its provisions.
Accordingly, one of the earliest acts of the Administration was the
proclamation of a blockade of the Southern ports. This was issued as
early as the nineteenth of April, 1861, two days after the Virginia
Convention adopted an ordinance of secession and thus made war a
certainty.
There is this peculiarity about the international law of blockade,
that the ships of no nation are under obligation to respect a blockade
until it shall be made effective. That is to say, until the nation
proclaiming the blockade can put a sufficient naval force at the mouth
of each blockaded harbor to prevent the entry of ships, no foreign
shipmasters are bound to respect the proclamation of blockade, and
their blockade-running ships are not subject to seizure in the attempt
to pass the paper barriers erected.
At the first, of course, the blockade of Southern ports was technical
rather than real. A foreign ship running in or out was not legally
subject to seizure or destruction because the blockade was manifestly
ineffective. But by impressing ferry-boats and every other craft that
could carry guns into the naval service, the Federal Government was
able presently to make its blockade so far effective that those ships
which essayed to "run" it did so at risk of capture and with the
certainty that capture must mean the confiscation of both ship and
cargo.
But so profitable was this commerce that the merchants and shipmasters
engaged in it were ready to take all the risks involved, for the sake
of its enormous pecuniary returns. It was a matter of easy reckoning
that a single cargo carried either way and successfully delivered,
would pay for the loss of the ship and cargo on the return voyage, and
leave a rich margin of profit besides.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account