The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical HistoryEggleston, George Cary
History
The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2): A Narrative and Critical History
Eggleston, George Cary
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
This defensive battle was not at all what the Confederate general had
hoped for or intended. He had been baffled of his purposes by adverse
circumstances. Had his enemy promptly evacuated Harper's Ferry as
he had expected and as McClellan had urged, Lee would have pushed
on towards Washington or Baltimore, giving battle as the assailant
wherever his march might have been opposed. The necessity of pausing
to reduce Harper's Ferry had delayed him during precious days, during
which McClellan's advance had completely changed the aspect of the
campaign. Instead of advancing to conquer Washington or Baltimore,
Lee fell back into a defensive position, there to meet an army nearly
or quite twice as large as his own. In the meanwhile the necessity of
living upon the country had completely demoralized those "lewd fellows
of the baser sort," who constitute a pestilently important contingent
in every fighting force. Men were away raiding chicken coops when
they should have been in line with guns in their hands. Straggling
was general beyond precedent, so that Lee declared that his army was
"ruined" by it, while D. H. Hill said in his report of operations
that "Had all our stragglers been up McClellan's army would have been
completely crushed or annihilated. Thousands of thievish poltroons had
kept away from sheer cowardice."
But the fact stares us in the face that McClellan had under his command
quite all of 70,000 men and probably more, while Lee had at most
considerably less than 40,000,--and as both armies were composed of
seasoned soldiers who had fought before, it is by no means safe to say
that if this or if that had been changed the result would have been
other than it was. With an "if," it is easy to demonstrate anything.
The simple facts are that on the seventeenth of September, 1862, the
two armies met on Antietam Creek in front of Sharpsburg, that they
fought all day with high courage and desperate determination on both
sides; that the Federals lost, by official report, 12,469 men, while
the Confederate loss, never accurately reported, was estimated at
between 9,000 and 10,000 men; that at the end of the struggle each army
held the position it had occupied at the beginning, neither having
yielded position to the other.
So far were both reluctant to renew the struggle that they lay still,
facing each other during the whole of the next day, neither side firing
a gun, and neither undertaking a maneuver of any kind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account