The History of the Crusades (vol. 1 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 1 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
In spite of all these fortifications of nature and art,[95] Antioch
had been several times taken. It fell at once into the power of the
Saracens, in the first age of the Hegira; it was afterwards retaken by
the Greeks, under Nicephorus Phocas; and, fourteen years before, the
Turks had rendered themselves masters of it. At the approach of the
Christians, the greater part of the Saracens of the neighbouring cities
and provinces had sought security in Antioch for themselves, their
wives, and treasures. Baghisian,[96] or Accien, grandson of Malek-Scha,
who had obtained the sovereignty of the city, had shut himself up in
it, with seven thousand horse and twenty thousand foot-soldiers.
The siege of Antioch presented many difficulties and dangers. The
chiefs of the Crusaders deliberated upon the propriety of undertaking
it; and the first who spoke in the council thought that it would be
imprudent to commence a siege at the beginning of winter. They did not
dread the arms of the Saracens, but the rains, the tempests, and the
horrors of famine. They advised the Crusaders to await in the provinces
and neighbouring cities the arrival of the aid promised by Alexius,
and the return of spring, by which time the army would have repaired
its losses, and received beneath its standards fresh reinforcements
from the West. This counsel was listened to with much impatience by the
greater part of the leaders, among whom were conspicuous the legate
Adhemar and the duke of Lorraine. “Ought we not, at once,” said they,
“to take advantage of the terror spread among the enemy? Is it right
to leave them time to rally and recover from their alarm? Is it not
well known that they have implored the succour of the caliph of Bagdad
and the sultan of Persia? Every moment of delay may strengthen the
armies of the Mussulmans, and rob the Christians of the fruits of their
victories. You talk of the arrival of the Greeks; but do we stand in
need of the Greeks to attack enemies already many times conquered? Was
it necessary to await for new Crusaders from the West, who would come
to share the glories and the conquests of the Christian army, without
having shared its dangers and its labours? As to the rigours of winter,
which they appeared so much to dread, it was an insult to the soldiers
of Jesus Christ to think them incapable of enduring cold and rain. It
was, in some sort, to compare them to those birds of passage which fly
away and hide themselves in secret places, when they see the bad season
approach.[97] It was, besides, impossible to think that a siege could
be protracted to any length with an army full of ardour and courage.
The Crusaders had only to remember the siege of Nice, the battle of
Dorylæum, and a thousand other exploits. Why should they be restrained
by the fear of want and famine? Had they not hitherto found in war all
the resources of war? They must know that victory had always supplied
the wants of the Crusaders, and that abundance awaited them in that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account