The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
These sentiments belonged to the manners of troubadours and knights;
but at the time of the first crusades, religious ideas were much more
mixed up with ideas of gallantry; a poet, invited to take the cross,
would not have dared to speak of his ladye-love,[258] without likewise
speaking of the mercy of God and the captivity of Jerusalem.
During the other crusades, the religion and morality of the Gospel
resumed their empire, and spread their benefits everywhere; at the
voice of the holy orators, Christians became penitent and reformed
their morals; all political tempests were laid by the simple name of
Jerusalem, and the West remained in profound peace.[259] It was not so
at the period we have just described; Europe was perhaps never more
agitated, or, perhaps, more corrupted than during the thirty years
which this crusade lasted.
In the relations between the Christians and Mussulmans, little respect
had, to this time, certainly, been paid to treaties; but in this
crusade, contempt for sworn faith and forgetfulness for the laws of
nations were carried to an extreme: signing a truce was a preparation
for war;—the Christian armies owed their safety to a treaty of peace;
and the sovereign pontiff, far from respecting the conditions of it,
preached a new crusade against the infidels. It must be allowed, also,
that the most solemn treaties were often violated by the Mussulmans.
The duration of peace depended solely upon the want of power in both
parties to resume hostilities with advantage. The least hope of
success was sufficient to induce them to fly to arms; the slightest
circumstance was an excuse for rekindling all the flames of war. The
continuator of William of Tyre says, with great ingenuousness, when
speaking of the death of a sultan of Damascus: “When the sultan died,
all the truces died with him.” These words alone are sufficient to give
an idea of the state of the East during the sixth crusade, and of the
small degree of respect then entertained for the laws of peace and war.
If, in the preceding crusade, the expedition of the soldiers of the
cross against Greece did not produce great advantages to the West,
it at least illustrated the arms of the Venetians and the French. In
the war we have just described, the knights and barons who took the
cross, added nothing to their glory or their renown. The Crusaders who
were fortunate enough to revisit their homes, brought back with them
nothing but the remembrance of most shameful disorders. A great number
of them had nothing to show their compatriots but the chains of their
captivity; nothing to communicate but the contagious disorders of the
East.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account