The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
The leaders of the crusade announced the wonderful success of their
enterprise to all the princes and nations of Christendom. Whilst
addressing the emperor of Germany,[106] they conjured him to take
part in the crusade, and come and place himself at the head of the
Christian knights. The account of their exploits excited the enthusiasm
of the faithful; the news, when carried into Syria, spread terror
among the Saracens, and revived the hopes of the king of Jerusalem
and the defenders of the Holy Land: so much glorious success ought to
have satisfied the pride and valour of the Crusaders; but, whilst the
world resounded with their glory, and trembled at the fame of their
arms, the knights and barons believed they had achieved nothing for
their own renown, or for the cause of God, until they had obtained
the approbation of the Holy See. The marquis of Montferrat, the count
of Flanders, the count of St. Pol, and the principal leaders of the
army, when writing to the pope, represented to him that the success
of their enterprise was not the work of men, but the work of God.
These warriors, filled with haughty pride, who had just conquered an
empire; who, according to Nicetas, boasted of _fearing nothing but
the falling of the heavens_, thus bent their victorious brows before
the tribunal of the sovereign pontiff, and protested at the feet of
Innocent, that no mundane view had directed their arms, and that he
must only contemplate in them the instruments Providence had employed
in accomplishing its designs.
Young Alexius, in concert with the leaders of the crusades, wrote at
the same time to the pope, to justify his conduct and that of his
liberators. “We avow,” said he, “that the principal cause that induced
the pilgrims to assist us, was that we had promised, with an oath,
to recognise the Roman pontiff as our ecclesiastical head, and the
successor of St. Peter.” Innocent III. in replying to the new emperor
of Constantinople, praised his intentions and his zeal, and pressed him
to accomplish his promises; but the excuses of the Crusaders were not
able to appease the resentment which the pope retained on account of
their disobedience to the counsels and commands of the Holy See. In his
answer, he did not salute them with his usual benediction, fearing that
they were again fallen under excommunication, by attacking the Greek
emperor in spite of his prohibition. If the emperor of Constantinople,
said he to them, does not make haste to do that which he has promised,
it will appear that neither his intentions nor yours have been sincere,
and _that you have added this second sin to that you have already
committed_. The pope gave the Crusaders fresh advice; but neither his
counsels nor his threats produced any better effect than they had done
at the siege of Zara: Providence was preparing in secret, events that
exceeded the foresight of the Crusaders, or even that of the Holy See,
and which would once again change the aim and object of the holy war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account