The History of the Devils of Loudun, Volumes I-III: The Alleged Possession of the Ursuline Nuns, and the Trial and Execution of Urbain Grandier, Told by an Eye-witnessDes Niau
History
The History of the Devils of Loudun, Volumes I-III: The Alleged Possession of the Ursuline Nuns, and the Trial and Execution of Urbain Grandier, Told by an Eye-witness
Des Niau
Couvent des Ursulines (Loudun, France); Demoniac possession; Grandier, Urbain, 1590-1634
Margaret Wallace[24] was tried before the Court of Justiciary. The
Duke of Lennox, the Archbishop of Glasgow, and Sir George Erskine of
Innerteil, sat as assessors to the judges, and an eminent counsel
was heard in behalf of the prisoner. She was accused of inflicting
and of curing diseases by inchantment; but it was not specified what
spells she employed. It was libelled against her, that on being taken
suddenly ill she sent for one Christian Graham, a notorious witch,
who afterwards suffered a capital punishment, and that this witch
transferred the disease from the prisoner to a young girl: That the
girl being thus taken ill, her mother was advised by the prisoner
to send for Christian Graham, who answered, that her confidence
was in God, and she would have nothing to do with the Devil or his
instruments: The prisoner replied, "That in a case of this sort
Christian Graham could do as much as God himself; and that without her
aid there was no remedy for the child:" But the mother not consenting,
the prisoner without her knowledge sent for Christian, who muttered
words, and expressed signs, by which she restored the child to health,
&c. Her counsel urged, that the indictment was much too general: That
it ought to have been specified, not simply that she did enchant,
but also by what kind of spells she performed her incantations: That
supposing Christian Graham to have been a witch, and that the prisoner
when taken ill consulted her, still he was entitled to plead that the
prisoner consulted her on account of her medical knowledge, and not for
her skill in sorcery: That as to blasphemous expressions however well
they might found a trial for blasphemy, they by no means inferred the
crime of witchcraft; and he quoted many authorities from the Civil and
Canon laws. He farther challenged one of the assizers, because one of
the articles charged against the prisoner was her having done an injury
to his brother-in-law.--The whole defences were repelled by the judges;
and the jury found the prisoner guilty.
1629.
_Isobel Young._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account