The history of the life and adventures of Mr. Duncan Campbell : $b a gentleman, who, tho' deaf and dumb, writes down any stranger's name at first sight, with their future contingencies of fortune
General
The history of the life and adventures of Mr. Duncan Campbell : $b a gentleman, who, tho' deaf and dumb, writes down any stranger's name at first sight, with their future contingencies of fortune
Campbell, Duncan, 1680?-1730; Deaf people -- Great Britain -- Biography; Occultism -- Early works to 1900; Prophets -- Great Britain -- Biography
Thus far as to express divination, or invocation of the devil, which is
detestable; and the very consulting of persons that use such unlawful
means is, according to the judgment of all casuists, the high road to
eternal damnation.
Now as to tacit divination, or invocation of the devil, that is divided
into two subaltern kinds. The first kind is, when for the sake of
knowing hidden things, they make use of a vain and superstitious
disposition existing in things to judge from; which disposition is not
of a sufficient virtue to lead them to any real judgment. The second
kind of tacit divination is, when that knowledge is sought by the
disposition of those things which men effect on purpose and of their own
accord, in order to come by and acquire that knowledge.
Both these kinds of tacit divination are again subdivided into several
species, as are particularly mentioned by St. Thomas, _Secunda Secundae,
Quaest. 95, Art. 3_; Gregory de Valentine, tom. iii. _Disput. 6. Quaest.
12. Puncto 2_; Toletus, _in Summa._ lib. iv. cap. 15; and Michael
Medina, lib. ii. _de Recta in Deum fide: post Sanctum Augustinum_. lib.
ii. _de Doct. Christ._ cap. 19. _et seq_.
The first of these kinds of tacit divination contains under it the
following several species:--
The first species is called Genethliacal, which is when from the
movement or situation of the stars, men's nativities are calculated and
inquired into so far, as that from such a search they pretend to deduce
the knowledge of human effects, and the contingent events that are to
attend them. This Thomas Aquinas and Sixtus Quintus condemns; but I
shall, with humility and submission to greater judgments, inquire
hereafter into their reasons, and give my opinion why I think this no
evil art; but I submit my opinion, if, after it is given, it is thought
erroneous.
The second is augury, when anything is predicted from the chattering of
birds, or the voice of animals, and this may be either lawful or
unlawful. If it comes from natural instinct, for brutes having only a
sensitive soul, have their organs subject to the disposition of the
greater bodies in which they are contained, and principally of all to
the celestial bodies, his augury is not amiss. For if when crows are
remarked to caw, as the vulgar phrase is, more than ordinary, it is,
judging according to the instinct of their nature, if we expect rain,
and we may reasonably depend upon it, we shall be right if we foretell
rain to be at hand. But sometimes the devils actuate those brute animals
to excite vain ideas in men, contrary to what the instinct of their
nature compels them to. This is superstitious and unlawful, and forbid
in holy writ.
The third is aruspicy, when from the flight of birds, or any other
motion of any animals whatsoever, persons pretend to have an insight and
a penetrative knowledge into occult and hidden matters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account