The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3)St. John, James Augustus
History
The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3)
St. John, James Augustus
Greece -- Social life and customs
It is sometimes believed that, in very remote ages, mankind possessed no
names for the winds,[1714] because as they had not yet addicted
themselves to navigation, it concerned them very little to observe how
or which way they blew. Possibly, however, we somewhat exaggerate the
heedlessness and ignorance of the remoter generations of men who must
have been singularly obtuse in their intellect if they could not tell
whether the wind blew up or down a valley, or on the back or front of
their houses, and had failed to designate the several currents of the
atmosphere by distinct appellations, whereby to distinguish them when
they had occasion to speak of their effects. About the period of the
Trojan war some inventive genius sprang up who gave a name to the north
and the south winds, and already in the time of Homer the Greeks had
contrived to have four points to their compass, at least the poet speaks
but of the four cardinal winds, Boreas, the north; Euros, the east;
Notos, the south, and Zephyros, the west. To these other four were
afterwards added, and at the same time some change was introduced into
the ancient nomenclature, the north-east was called Cæcias;[1715] the
south-east, Euros; the name of the east being changed to Apeliotes; the
south-west, Libs; the north-west, Argestes, and sometimes
Olympias,[1716] or Iapyx, or Sciron; which, however, according to Pliny
differed from the Argestes, and was peculiar to Athens. These are the
winds represented on the tower of Andronicos Cyrrhestes at Athens,
spoken of by Varro, Vitruvius,[1717] and many modern travellers.
Pliny,[1718] Galen, and Aulus Gellius differ from Aristotle in confining
the name of Aparctias to the north wind, and giving that of Boreas to
the north-east, or Aquilo of the Romans.[1719]
-----
Footnote 1714:
See Gœttling’s note on v. 379, of Hesiod’s Theogon. p. 38, seq.
Footnote 1715:
Called also Ἑλλησποντίας, by Aristot. Probl. xxvi. 58. Plin. ii. 46.
Cf. Aristoph. Eq. 435.
Footnote 1716:
Cf. Theoph. Caus. Plant. v. 2. 5. Hist. Plant. iv. 14. 11.
Footnote 1717:
l. i. c. 6.
Footnote 1718:
Nat. Hist. ii. 46.
Footnote 1719:
See further in Coray, Disc. Prelim. ad Hippoc. § 61.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account