The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
absconded, I cannot think that his Antagonist _Felix_, who was still
alive, and had done nothing we know of to disoblige the Emperor, and the
_Arian_ Party, by whom he had been formerly raised to that See, would
have neglected so favourable an Opportunity of recovering his antient
Dignity. If what _Theodoret_ says be true, _Gregory Nazianzen_ is highly
to blame for not excepting _Liberius_; when he writ, that the Bishops
either all complied, or were driven into Exile, excepting a few, who
were too insignificant to be taken notice of by the Emperor, or his
Ministers[934]. [Sidenote: Arianism _universally obtains_.] Be that as
it will, it is certain, that at this time the _Arian_ Doctrine
universally obtained; that the Face of the Church appeared quite
deformed and disfigured[935], that the whole World saw itself, with
Astonishment, all on a sudden become _Arian_[936]; that the Boat of St.
_Peter_, to use St. _Jerom_’s Expression, tossed by furious Winds, by
violent Storms, was upon the Point of sinking, and no Hopes of Safety
seemed to be left[937].
-----
Footnote N18:
This Confession is called sometimes the _Confession of_ Nice _in_
Thrace, and sometimes the _Confession of_ Rimini; but it differed from
both. By the Confession of _Nice_, the Son was acknowleged to be like
to the Father, without the Addition of the Words _in all Things_,
which were an essential Part of the last Confession of _Sirmium_. In
that of _Rimini_ the Son was said _not to be a Creature like other
Creatures_, and there were no such Words in the Confession of
_Sirmium_. But by all Three the Word _Consubstantial_ was rejected,
and no other would satisfy the Orthodox, acknowleging the Son to be
_of the same Substance with the Father_. Both the _Arians_ and
_Semi-Arians_ allowed the Son to be like to the Father: but that
Likeness was by them very differently understood and interpreted. The
_Arians_ held him to be _like_ rather by Grace than by Nature, and as
like as a Creature could be to the Creator[N18.1]. The _Semi-Arians_
confessed him to be like in _Nature_, in _Existence_, in _Essence_, in
_Substance_, and in _every thing else_. But the Orthodox maintained
him to be of the _same Substance_ with the Father, and consequently of
the _same Existence_, _Essence_, &c. and, to express this _Sameness_
or _Identity_, they chose the Word _Consubstantial_.
Footnote N18.1:
Ruff. l. 1. c. 25.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account