The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
of our Saviour was impassible and immortal; that it was not taken of the
Virgin _Mary_; that he was not born of her; that his Birth, Passion,
Death, and Resurrection, were mere Illusions; or else, that the Divine
Nature was passible: both which Absurdities were admitted by some of the
Sects into which the _Apollinarists_ were afterwards divided[1077].
[Sidenote: Apollinaris _not known nor suspected to be the Author of
the Heresy he broached_.]
This Doctrine was first heard of in 362. and condemned the same Year in
the Council of _Alexandria_. In 373. it began to make a great Noise in
the Church; but it was not known even then by whom it had been broached:
for _Apollinaris_ was so far from owning himself the Author of those
Tenets, that, in one of his Letters to _Serapion_ Bishop of _Thmuis_ in
_Egypt_, which is still extant[1078], he expresses, in the strongest
Terms, his Approbation of a Letter from _Athanasius_ to _Epictetus_
Bishop of _Corinth_, confuting the very Errors he held; and at the same
time condemns the Folly of those, who maintained the Flesh to be
consubstantial to the Divine Nature. In another Letter to the same
_Serapion_, he owns the Body of our Saviour to have been taken of the
Virgin _Mary_, to have been formed in her Womb, and his Flesh to have
been of the same Substance with ours; adding, _And these are Truths not
to be called in question_[1079]. In a Third Letter he assures
_Serapion_, that he has ever denied in his Writings the Flesh of our
Saviour to have descended from Heaven, or to be of the same Substance
with the Divinity[1080]. _Apollinaris_, by thus publicly declaring
against the Doctrine, which at the same time he was privately
propagating, eluded the Vigilance of _Athanasius_ himself, who, in
confuting his Errors, never mentions his Name, nor seems to have
entertained the least Suspicion of him; nay, he recommended _Timotheus_,
a favourite Disciple of his, to _Damasus_, as a Person whose Orthodoxy
was not to be questioned; and as such he was received, not only by the
Bishop of _Rome_, but by all the Western Bishops, of whom he obtained
Letters, on his Return, directed to _Apollinaris_, as to a Bishop of the
Catholic Communion[1081].
[Sidenote: _His Errors condemned in a Council at_ Rome.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account