The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
_Innocent_, acting with his usual Prudence and Circumspection, in his
Answer to the above-mentioned Letters, declared, that he admitted the
Bishops of both Parties to his Communion, from which he could exclude no
Man till he was lawfully judged and condemned; and that therefore, to
compose all Differences, and leave no room for Complaints on either
Side, it was fit a Council should be assembled, consisting of the
Western as well as the Eastern Bishops. The other Bishops of _Italy_, to
whom _Chrysostom_ had written, returned much the same Answer[1414],
following therein the Advice, which _Chrysostom_ himself had given to
the Bishops of his Party; _viz._ that they should communicate with his
Enemies, to prevent Divisions in the Church, but not sign his
Condemnation, because he did not think himself guilty[1415].
_Innocent_’s Answer to _Theophilus_ was in Words to the same Effect. His
Letter to _Chrysostom_ was carried into the East by _Demetrius_ Bishop
of _Pessinus_, who took care to shew it every-where, to the end it might
be every-where known, that the _Roman_ Church still communicated with
that holy Bishop[1416].
[Sidenote: Theophilus _writes to_ Innocent.]
A few Days after _Innocent_ had answered _Chrysostom_’s Letter,
_Petrus_, one of _Theophilus_’s Presbyters, and _Martyrius_ Deacon of
the Church of _Constantinople_, arrived at _Rome_, with Letters from
_Theophilus_, and the Acts of _Chrysostom_’s Deposition by the Council
_ad Quercum_. From these it appeared, that the Council had consisted of
Thirty-six Bishops, whereof Twenty-nine were _Egyptians_, and over these
_Theophilus_ had, as their Metropolitan, too great an Influence; that
_Chrysostom_ had been condemned without being heard, and that nothing
had been laid to his Charge, deserving so severe and exemplary a
Punishment. [Sidenote: Innocent_'s Answer to_ Theophilus.] _Innocent_
therefore, having read them, with the utmost Indignation, answered
_Theophilus_ in a few Words; that he was determined, as he had notified
to him by his former Letter, to communicate both with him and his
Brother _John_; that he could by no means depart from the Communion of
the latter, till he was lawfully judged and condemned; that a Council
was to be soon held, before which it was incumbent upon _Theophilus_ to
make good his Charge, and the Steps he had hitherto taken, by the Canons
and Decrees of the Council of _Nice_, since the _Roman_ Church admitted
no others[1417]. [Sidenote: _Letters from the Bishops of_
Chrysostom_’s Party to_ Innocent.] With this Letter _Petrus_ and
_Martyrius_ returned to _Constantinople_, whence arrived at _Rome_, soon
after their Departure from that City, _Theoctecnus_, a Presbyter of the
Church of _Constantinople_, and one of _Chrysostom_’s Friends, with
Letters from Twenty-five Bishops, informing _Innocent_, that
_Chrysostom_ had been driven a Second time from his See; that he had
been conducted by a Band of Soldiers to _Cucusus_, and confined to that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account