The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836Joyce, Herbert
History
The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836
Joyce, Herbert
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
A third proposition was that there could not be what, if it be not a
contradiction in terms, we will call a one-sided correspondence. He
regarded it as an absolute certainty, amounting almost to an axiom, that
whatever number of letters a town might receive, it would send the same
or nearly the same number in reply. If, therefore, as between two towns,
he found from his vouchers that one was sending to the other more
letters than the other sent in return, he immediately concluded that
something was wrong. It is interesting to note how his views on this
point were confirmed by experience. During the year 1732 the postage on
letters sent from Nottingham to Newark amounted to £25, whereas on those
sent from Newark to Nottingham it amounted to only £13. Surely, writes
Allen, the amounts should be nearly equal. Ascertain whether this comes
"from faults, errors, or a real deadness in the correspondence," and to
enable him to do this the surveyor was to take the Newark office under
his care for a week or a fortnight. Here Allen speaks with confidence
indeed, and yet as though some doubt might exist; but a few years later
there is no doubt at all. "In the Chipping Norton vouchers," he writes,
"another remarkable oddness is that the letters received by that deputy
appear to be double the number sent from that office, which is not only
different from any other well-managed office, but 'tis out of all rules
of proportion with respect to correspondence." And again, "The receipt
of Chipping Norton's letters are still double the number of what Mr.
Mackerness in his vouchers enters as sent from his stage. I can't
conceive how 'tis possible for this difference to arise where an office
is justly managed. Fully examine into the cause of it."
But there were other irregularities which, as being further removed from
observation, were still more difficult to check. Between Worcester and
Bewdley there had been great delay. "The account sent me," writes Allen,
"is that, tho' both these deputys are paid for riding their whole
stages, by a private arrangement between themselves they exchange the
mails at an alehouse on the road, and neither of them will ride beyond
that place, tho' one of them should happen to arrive there several hours
before the other can reach it." The postmaster of Lynn, in Norfolk, who
was paid by Allen to keep a check upon other postmasters in the
neighbourhood, calls his attention to their remissness in delivering
letters. Sometimes, he states, they keep letters several days. On this
account letters that would otherwise go by post are sent by friend or
carrier. "I am perfectly ashamed," he adds, and when I remonstrate and
"set forth the complaints of our gentlemen," the postmasters plead that
they are not paid for delivery, "and therefore think themselves not
obliged to send out their letters even to persons inhabiting within
their own towns."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account