The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836Joyce, Herbert
History
The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836
Joyce, Herbert
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
There were one or two points on which Cotton and Frankland did not agree
with Hamilton. Experience had taught them, as they stated on another
occasion, that the way to improve the Post Office revenue was to "make
the intercourse of letters easy to people." So now, in their
representation to the Treasury, they condemned the inland rates which
Hamilton proposed as altogether too high. They had been long enough at
the Post Office, they said, to know that "the easy and cheap
corresponding doth encourage people to write letters, and that this
revenue was but little in proportion to what it is now till the postage
of letters was reduced from 6d.[33] to 3d."
[33] This is an allusion to the period antecedent to 1657.
Hamilton had contemplated the passing of a fresh Act of Parliament in
order to impose sea-rates and to oblige shipmasters to give up their
letters as soon as they reached port. Cotton and Frankland were not
satisfied that a fresh Act of Parliament was necessary; nor did they
express any opinion as to the particular rates which should be imposed.
They recommended, however, the appointment of an officer whose duty it
should be "to take care of" all letters for America, and to put them
into a special bag to be sealed with the office seal. Public notice
should at the same time be given prohibiting the collection of such
letters by other persons. To the shipmaster to whom the bag might be
delivered the inducement to take it without delay to the Post Office of
the port at which he should first arrive would be that he would there
receive one penny for each letter the bag might contain. Hitherto, under
the coffee-house arrangement, the penny had been paid in England; for
the future, it would be paid in America. In other words, the shipmaster,
instead of receiving his recompense in advance, would receive it after
his work was done and only provided it was done properly.
On one point the postmasters-general held a decided opinion. Towards the
support of the posts the Government of New York had made an annual
contribution of £50, in consideration of which the Government letters
appear to have been carried free; but otherwise Neale's undertaking had
not received from the authorities that countenance and support which, in
Cotton and Frankland's opinion, were essential to its success. They
expressed themselves convinced that, for want of due encouragement, the
posts would never prosper in private hands, and recommended that they
should be transferred to the Crown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account