The History of the Rifle Brigade (the Prince Consort's Own) Formerly the 95thCope, William Henry
History
The History of the Rifle Brigade (the Prince Consort's Own) Formerly the 95th
Cope, William Henry
Great Britain. Army. Rifle Brigade (Prince Consort's Own)
This important work having fallen, immediate preparations were made
for re-embarking the troops, and attacking Mobile. But on the 14th
news arrived of the preliminaries of peace between England and the
United States having been settled at Ghent on December 24. All
warlike operations of course terminated; and the troops only awaited
on Île Dauphine the ratification of the treaty by President Madison.
Intelligence of this reached them on the 5th March, and on the 15th
the officers and Riflemen who had been made prisoners re-joined the
Battalion, having been released under the terms of the treaty. Major
Mitchell had been roughly treated by General Jackson, because he
refused to furnish him with information of our strength or movements.
On the 31st March the Battalion embarked on board the ‘Dover,’ some
few men being placed on board the ‘Norfolk’ transport. On the 4th
April they set sail, and, having called at the Havannah, arrived
at Plymouth, whence they were ordered round to Dover, where they
disembarked on the 2nd June and moved to Shorncliffe, where they
found three companies of the Battalion, the remaining two being in
Flanders, as is now to be narrated.
FOOTNOTES:
[131] George Simmons had been brought up to the medical profession.
[132] ‘Napier,’ Book xxiii. chap. 3.
[133] Nineteen men of the 1st Battalion, and 1 bugler and 12 men of
the 2nd Battalion, were returned as ‘missing.’
[134] He was, while the 1st Battalion were absent, temporarily
attached to the 2nd Battalion; being employed on the telegraph of the
Light Division.
[135] ‘Twelve Years’ Military Adventure.’
[136] See Napier, Book xxiv. chap. 5.
[137] Surtees, 296, 297. The context is very confused, the editor not
having been able to decipher or to arrange Surtees’ MS.
[138] Record, 2nd Battalion. As the return in the ‘London Gazette’
does not distinguish the regiments of the non-commissioned officers
and privates, I am unable to give the casualties of the other
Battalions.
[139] It is evident from Sir Thomas Graham’s letters to Lord Bathurst
and Lord Wellington (‘Supplementary Despatches,’ viii. 376-7) that
he undertook this command very unwillingly and only from a sense
of duty. To Lord Wellington he says ‘I cannot look forward to it
otherwise than an irksome service, with scarce a chance of any
material success.’
[140] It would appear from a private letter from Lord Bathurst to
Lord Wellington, that the strength of the detachment of the 3rd
Battalion was 250 men. ‘Supplementary Despatches,’ viii. 390. This is
a clerical or typographical error for ‘of the three Battalions.’ The
depôt companies were at this time very weak, and the strength of the
whole detachment was about 250 men.
[141] Graham’s Despatch, ‘Annual Register,’ lvi., 154.
[142] Despatch, ‘Annual Register,’ 157.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account