The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
The stationing of troops in _Boston_ might afford greater personal
security to the commissioners than what they could otherwise have
enjoyed, and might induce them or their underlings to exceed the bounds
of their commission, or of prudence, but could not prevent smuggling, or
protect informers from insult and abuse. Even skippers, bound to
different parts of the colony, had their vessels stopt and libelled, for
having uncleared articles of trifling consequence on board. Persons who
ventured to lodge informations, when discovered, were often subject to a
treatment which gave them a ridiculous appearance, and laid them under a
difficulty to clear themselves of the dress imposed upon them. They were
stripped, well tarred, and then covered with feathers. The punishment
took so with the lower class of people, that afterward it was not
confined to informers, but was also applied by them to others who
offended their dread majesty. There was a degree of intemperance and
indiscreetness on the part of the commissioners and custom-house
officers, which tended to irritate; whereas the utmost lenity and
forbearance were requisite in order to general tranquility. Mr. _Eliot_,
at _New-York_, where smuggling was as prevalent as at Boston, found it
necessary to wink at many irregularities, that he might prevent
disturbances and ill humor among the body of merchants. The
commissioners expressed their dissatisfaction, and wanted him to alter
his line of conduct: he stated the case to a friend at home, and by his
influence was secured from such like directions in future. They
transmitted to Britain such representations of Mr. _Otis_, jun. as
provoked him to insert a publication in the Boston gazette, which
brought on an affray at the coffee-house between him and Mr. _Robinson_,
one of the commissioners, from the latter’s attempting to pull the other
by the nose, because of some expressions in the said publication. Mr.
Robinson being in danger of coming off with the worst, several of the
company fell upon Mr. Otis; some of whom held him, while others struck
him with canes or different weapons. A friend passing along, observed
what was doing, pressed in and rescued Mr. Otis, though he himself
suffered considerably from the assailants. The noise soon drew
multitudes about the house, when Mr. Robinson and his associates
prudently retreated by means of a backdoor.[101] This procedure of the
revenue officers (for no military one was present) opened a large field
of altercation and multiplied quarrels, which were before too frequent
between the king’s officers and the leaders of opposition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account