The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
“We have heard it publicly said of late, oftener than formerly,
_Whosoever sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed_. This
is plainly, gentlemen, a general rule, which like all others of the kind
must have its exceptions—a rule, which if taken in its strict literal
latitude, would imply, that a man killing another in self-defence, would
incur the pains of death—a doctrine that certainly never prevailed under
the _Mosaical_ institution; for we find the _Jews_ had their six cities
of refuge, to which the man-slayer might flee from the avenger of
blood.” Let it be observed _en passant_, that it was ordained that the
man-slayer should abide in the city of refuge till the death of the
high-priests, so every person to escape such confinement and restraint,
would be extremely careful lest he should prove the casual occasion of
another’s death; and would not venture upon gratifying a settled or
sudden evil disposition, by needlessly slaying a fellow-creature,
because it would pass for chance-medly. But to go on in company with Mr.
Quincy. “And so, that _the_ MURDERER _shall flee to the pit_, comes
under the same consideration. And when we hear it asked, as it very
lately has been,” Who DARE stay him? “I answer, if the laws of our
country stay him, you ought to do likewise; and every good subject
_dares_ to do what the law allows. But the very position is _begging the
question_; for the question now in issue is, whether either of the
prisoners is _a murderer_ in the sense of our laws, what is murder and
what not, is a _question of law_ arising upon facts stated and allowed.”
“Again, you shall take no satisfaction for the life of a _murderer_, who
is _guilty of death_.” Here again is a begging the question; and
moreover the words _guilty of death_, if rightly considered, must be one
of those general rules which always have their exceptions. But in the
margin of our great bible, we find them rendered _faulty to die_.
Against a position of this kind we have no objection. If we have
committed _a fault_, on which our laws inflict the punishment of
_death_, we must suffer. But what fault we have committed, you are to
inquire; or rather you, gentlemen, are to find the _facts proved in
court against us_, and the judges are to see and consider what the law
pronounces touching our offence, and what punishment is thereby
inflicted as a penalty.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account