The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
government (of England) but as near as may be to it; and this variation
is allowed but for the sake of emergencies; and that latitude bounded
with these words, _for the good of the adventurer and planter_. This tax
is not to be found in the duke’s conveyances, but is an after business.
Had the planters foreseen it, they would sooner have taken up in any
other plantation in America—[a plain intimation that no such tax was
imposed in any other American plantation.] Beside, there is no end of
this power; for since we are by this precedent assessed without any law,
and thereby excluded our English right of common assent to taxes; what
security have we of any thing we possess? We can call nothing our own,
but are tenants at will not only for the soil, but for all our personal
estates; we endure penury, and the sweat of our brows, to improve them
at our own hazard only. This is to transplant from good to bad. _This
sort of conduct has destroyed government, but never raised one to any
true greatness._[35]
The paper presented to the duke’s commissioners, evidently proves, that
it was the opinion of these gentlemen, who were quakers, that no tax
could be justly imposed upon the inhabitants, without their own consent
first had, and by the authority of their own general assembly. The
report of the council in favour of the aggrieved, and the relief that
followed, were virtual concessions to the same purport. This will not be
judged wholly unprecedented by those who are acquainted with what
happened relative to the county-palatine and city of _Chester_, in the
35th year of the reign of _Henry_ VIII. [1543.] The inhabitants
complained in a petition to the king, that for want of knights and
burgesses in the court of parliament, they sustained manifold damages,
not only in their lands, goods, and bodies, but in the civil and politic
governance and maintenance of the commonwealth of their said county; and
that while they had been always bound by the acts and statutes of the
said court of parliament, the same as other counties, cities, and
boroughs, that had knights and burgesses in said court, they had often
been touched, and grieved with acts and statutes made within the said
court, as well derogatory unto the most ancient jurisdictions,
liberties, and privileges of the said court-palatine, as prejudicial
unto the commonwealth, quietness, and peace of his majesty’s subjects.
They proposed to the king, as a remedy, that it would please his
highness, that it be enacted, with the assent of the lords spiritual and
temporal, and by the commons in parliament assembled, that from the end
of the session, the county-palatine shall have two knights for the said
county, and likewise two citizens to be burgesses for the city of
Chester. The complaint and remedy were thought to be so just and
reasonable, that the relief for which they prayed was granted, and they
were admitted to send representatives to parliament, to guard their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account