The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
Governor _Archdale_ arrived at Carolinia in August, 1695. He managed
with great prudence, and succeeded so well, that the assembly voted him
an address of thanks. He was succeeded by _Joseph Blake_, esq. whose
sentiments were so liberal, that, though a dissenter, he prevailed with
the assembly to settle £ 150 _per annum_ upon the episcopal minister of
Charles-town for ever, and likewise to furnish him with a good house, a
glebe, and two servants. A very different spirit wrought in the earl of
Bath, when he succeeded to the power of palatine [1701.] and became
eldest proprietary. Being a zealot for the church of England, he was
ambitious of establishing its worship, and of excluding
non-episcopalians from a share in the government of Carolina; a similar
principle was at that time too prevalent in England. His views were
seconded by the pliableness of governor _Moor_, who was after a while
succeeded by Sir _Nathaniel Johnson_. Then the assembly being convened,
a bill was brought in for the more effectual preservation of the
government, by requiring all persons chosen members of the assembly, to
conform to religious worship, and receive the sacrament of the Lord’s
supper, according to the usage of the church of England. By this act,
all dissenters were disqualified from sitting in the assembly, though
legally elected, and the candidate who had the greatest number of
voices, after the disqualified dissenter, was to be admitted. The
passing of this act was unconstitutional and oppressive. Another bill
was passed for establishing religious worship in the province, according
to the church of England, and also for the erecting of churches, the
maintenance of ministers, and the building of convenient parsonages.
Both these acts were afterwards signed and settled by John lord
Granville, then palatine, for himself and the other proprietors. In
consequence of the last act, many oppressions were committed by the
government against the dissenters, who laboured under these and other
grievances, till the matter at length was brought before the house of
lords, who having fully weighed the same, addressed the queen in favour
of the Carolinians; and the laws complained of [1706.] were declared
null and void.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account