The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
[1692.] The first act of the _Massachusetts_ legislature, after the
arrival of the charter, was a kind of Magna Charta, asserting and
setting forth their general privileges, and this clause was among the
rest, “_No aid, tax, tallage, assessment, custom, loan, benevolence, or
imposition whatsoever, shall be laid, assessed, imposed, or levied on
any of his majesty’s subjects, or their estates, on any pretence
whatever, but by the act and consent of the governor, council and
representatives of the people, assembled in general court_.” The general
court passed others favourable to liberty, which were perused by the
ministers of England at a distant period; and with the preceding,
disallowed of by the regency in 1695. In December the reasons of this
dissent were transmitted to the governor and council. The following
extract from the letter sent by the committee of plantations, is
subjoined, because of its being so extraordinary and decisive: “Whereas,
by the act for securing the liberty of the subject, and preventing
illegal imprisonments, the writ of Hæbeas Corpus is required to be
granted, in like manner as is appointed by the statute of 31 Charles II.
in England, which privilege has not yet been granted in any of his
majesty’s plantations; it was not thought in his majesty’s absence, that
the said act should be continued in force, and therefore the same hath
been repealed.”
The above extract makes this a proper place for mentioning, that the
ancient colonists being destitute of proper security, for want of an
Hæbeas Corpus act, were in some provinces grievously oppressed. Edward
Randolph, surveyor-general, during the reign of William III. represented
their condition to the board of trade, March 1700; and among other
beneficial regulations, he recommended, “That it being the practice of
governors to imprison the subjects without bail, the Hæbeas Corpus act
should be extended as fully to the colonies as it is in England.” It was
accordingly soon after conferred on Virginia, by queen Anne. The council
in their address said upon the occasion, “We, the council of Virginia,
acknowledge your majesty’s late favour, in allowing us the benefit of
the Hæbeas Corpus act, and in appointing courts of oyer and terminer,
for the more speedy execution of justice, and relief from long
imprisonments.” The lower house, in theirs, said, “We the burgesses now
assembled, do beseech your majesty to accept our sincere thanks for your
many favours bestowed on your subjects of this colony. We shall not
pretend to enumerate the particulars, nor can we omit mentioning those
lately communicated to us by your majesty’s royal instructions to your
governor, wherein you have asserted to your subjects their legal rights
and properties, by allowing them the Hæbeas Corpus act.”[52]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account