The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 2 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
The heat of it, with small arms, lasted about forty minutes; but the
cannonading continued after the royal detachment had given way. In the
course of it, a shot passed through gen. Burgoyne’s hat, and another
tore his waistcoat. A battalion of Brunswickers ran, though not one of
them was killed, and would never come on again.[70] To this misbehavior
some may be ready to ascribe the want of success on the side of the
British, and as a consequence of it, the loss of the whole army.
Whatever such behaviour might contribute toward the event, the bravery
of the Americans had certainly a very considerable share in it. The
royal detachment was driven by them near upon two miles, and had scarce
entered the camp when it was stormed by them with great fury; for they
rushed on to the lines under one of the heaviest cannonades of
artillery, grape-shot and rifle fire ever beheld, and never gave way
till they met the British grenadiers. Some of the British officers were
astonished at hearing the fire of the American musketry kept up with
such vigor and constancy, after undergoing so heavy a fire of
artillery.[71] One of the bravest of them[72] is ready to declare, that
whenever he has been opposed to the Americans, they have fought with
courage and obstinacy. He found it so in the above action. General
Arnold was next to military mad. He appeared, in the heat of the
engagement, so beside himself as scarce to know what he did. He struck
several of the officers with his sword, without any apparent reason; and
when they told him of it the next day, meaning to remonstrate and
require satisfaction, he declared he recollected nothing at all of it,
and was sorry if it was so. Some of his orders were exceedingly rash and
injudicious, and argued thoughtlessness rather than courage.[73] His
attack upon the British varied so from established military maxims, that
the royal officers inferred from it, that gen. Gates did not personally
command in the action. Gates remained for the most part in the camp, as
on the 19th of September, that he might the better guide the general
operations, and give the necessary directions as they were wanted.
Arnold’s left-handed variation might however contribute greatly toward
obtaining the victory. The British have been at length taught by
experience, that neither American attacks nor resistance, are to be
despised.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account