The history of the South African forces in FranceBuchan, John
History
The history of the South African forces in France
Buchan, John
South Africa. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- France; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- South Africa
This plan had to be wholly recast. The British and French Governments
decided that Haig must take over a longer front, and before the end of
February 1917 the British right was as far south as a point opposite
the town of Roye. Again, the retreat of the Germans during February and
March 1917 destroyed the salient which Haig had purposed to attack. There
now remained nothing of the preliminary movement as originally planned,
except the carrying of the Vimy Ridge. But a fresh scheme had been
proposed by the French and accepted by the British Government. Under
the new French Commander-in-Chief, Nivelle, an ambitious operation was
conceived on the heights of the Aisne, which, it was trusted, would open
the way to Laon. In this action the old method of limited objectives was
to be relinquished; and Nivelle hoped, by means of his new tactics and by
an unexampled concentration of troops, to break through the enemy lines
on a broad front and restore the war of movement. This attack was fixed
for the middle of April. It would operate against the southern pivot of
the Siegfried zone, and it was arranged that Haig should use his forces
against the northern pillar east of Arras, and should strike a week
before.
The position was, therefore, that the Arras battle, which Haig had
regarded as only a preparation for the main campaign of the season in
Flanders, became the principal task of the British Army during the first
half of 1917. This battle in turn was conceived as an action subsidiary
to the greater effort of the French in the south. It was admittedly an
attack in a region where, except for an unexampled piece of fortune,
great strategic results could scarcely be obtained. The British success
depended upon what the French could do on the Aisne. If Nivelle failed,
then they, too, must fail in the larger strategic sense, however valuable
might be certain of their local gains. If, however, Nivelle succeeded,
the pressure from Arras in the north would beyond doubt greatly
contribute to the enemy’s discomfiture. The danger of the whole plan was
that the issue might be indeterminate and the fighting at Arras so long
protracted, without any decisive success, that the chances of the more
vital Flanders offensive later in the summer would be imperilled. This,
as we shall see, was precisely what happened.
[Sidenote: _Jan. 14, 1917._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account