The history of the South African forces in FranceBuchan, John
History
The history of the South African forces in France
Buchan, John
South Africa. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- France; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- South Africa
The coming attack was much canvassed in Germany beforehand, and von
Armin, having learned the lesson of his defeat at Messines, had prepared
his defences. In Flanders the nature of the ground did not permit of
a second Siegfried Line. Deep dug-outs and concreted trenches were
impossible because of the water-logged soil, and he was compelled to find
new tactics. His solution was the “pill-box.” These were small concrete
forts, sited among the ruins of a farm or in some derelict piece of
woodland, often raised only a yard or two above the ground level, and
bristling with machine guns. The low entrance was at the rear, and the
“pill-box” could hold from eight to forty men. It was easy to make, for
the wooden or steel framework could be brought up on any dark night and
filled with concrete. They were echeloned in depth with great skill,
and, in the wiring, alleys were left so that an unwary advance would be
trapped among them and exposed to enfilading fire. Their small size made
them a difficult mark for heavy guns, and since they were protected by
concrete at least three feet thick, they were impregnable to the ordinary
barrage of field artillery.
Von Armin’s plan was to hold his first line—which was often a mere string
of shell craters—with few men, who would fall back before an assault.
He had his guns well behind, so that they should not be captured in the
first rush, and would be available for a barrage if his opponents became
entangled in the “pill-box” zone. Finally, he had his reserves in the
second line, ready for the counterstroke before the attack could secure
its position. It will be seen that these tactics were admirably suited
for the exposed and contorted ground of the Salient. Any attack would be
allowed to make some advance; but if the German plan worked well, this
advance would be short-lived and would be dearly paid for. Instead of the
cast-iron front of the Siegfried area, the Flanders line would be highly
elastic, but it would spring back into position after pressure with a
deadly rebound.
[Sidenote: _July 31._]
The “preparation” for the battle lasted for the greater part of July, and
every part of the Salient was drenched with our fire. On the last day of
the month came the advance on a front of 15 miles—from the river Lys to
a little north of Steenstraate, the main effort being that of the Fifth
Army, under Sir Hubert Gough, on the 7½ miles between Boesinghe and the
Zillebeke-Zandvoorde road. With the attack the weather broke. Gough’s
purpose was to carry the enemy’s first defences, situated on the forward
slope of the rising ground, and his second position along the crest.
The opening day saw a brilliant success, for everywhere we captured the
first line, and in many parts the second. But the weather prevented the
series of cumulative blows which we had planned. For a fortnight we were
compelled to hold our hand, since till the countryside grew dryer advance
was a stark impossibility.
[Sidenote: _Aug. 16._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account