The History of the Standard Oil CompanyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
The History of the Standard Oil Company
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
Petroleum industry and trade -- United States -- History; Standard Oil Company -- History
A mass-meeting is not a deliberative body; it always acts under the
feeling of impulse or passions, and meets for predetermined
purposes, one of which in this case, as appears in the articles of
the newspapers calling the meeting, was to denounce and show its
scorn for anything and everything connected with the South
Improvement Company. Hence it required no prophet to tell beforehand
in what spirit my telegrams to you would be listened to. You ask me
to go to Franklin to consult my true friends. I will most gladly
meet you and your friends at any place favourable to calm
investigation and deliberation, and therefore outside of the
atmosphere of excitement by which you are surrounded, say at Albany
or New York.
I can well understand that, however, the excited people of your
region may misjudge, they have no other purpose than to promote the
public interest, and knowing that you deservedly enjoy their
confidence, I am strongly convinced that a free and frank
interchange of views at the conference suggested would result in
satisfying you and the people that there exists no cause for
regarding us as enemies. I therefore hope you will name an early day
for the meeting.
P. H. WATSON.
* * * * *
Mr. Gilfillan.
I would like to suggest a question that would throw a little light
upon this subject, and which I know Mr. Watson will be entirely
satisfied to answer. I wish the chairman would ask if the objects of
the South Improvement Company, in connection with railroads, were
presented to the public through any statement in writing or by
telegraph to the public, explaining the objects.
_The Chairman._—I am coming to that, but first I want to know of the
witness, whether he received any replies to these despatches?
_A._ Yes, sir, to one of them.
_Q._ Have you a copy of that?
_A._ I have not, but I have stated the purport of the answer. To the
first I did not receive any answer; there was not time to receive
any, and I did not expect it. I sent the second shortly after, and
the answer was to the first and second together. To the third I
received no telegraphic answer.
_Q._ You say you have no copy of these answers you received?
_A._ I have not. I gave the purport of the answer I received at the
last meeting.
_Q._ Were there any other letters or statements published by your
authority to the public or to parties in interest among the
producers?
_A._ These were not published by my authority.
_Q._ Was there any other matter published by your authority, giving
explanation to the people?
_A._ I made similar statements to a great many of the producers.
_Q._ I mean documentary evidence; was there anything published over
your signature?
_A._ Oh, I did not publish any document at all; I did not publish
this.
_Q._ Did you authorise it?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account