The History of the Standard Oil CompanyTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
The History of the Standard Oil Company
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
Petroleum industry and trade -- United States -- History; Standard Oil Company -- History
Bad as the charter was in appearance, the oil men found that the
contracts which the new company had made with the railroads were worse.
These contracts advanced the rates of freight from the Oil Regions over
100 per cent.—an advance which more than covered the margin of profit on
their business—but it was not the railroad that got the greater part of
this advance; it was the South Improvement Company. Not only did it ship
its own oil at fully a dollar a barrel cheaper on an average than
anybody else could, but it received fully a dollar a barrel “rake-off”
on every barrel its competitors shipped. It was computed and admitted by
the members of the company who appeared before the investigating
committee of Congress that this discrimination would have turned over to
them fully $6,000,000 annually on the carrying trade. The railroads
expected to receive about one and a half millions more than from the
existing rates. That is, an additional cost of about $1.25 a barrel was
added to crude oil, and it was computed that this would enable the
refiners to advance their wholesale price at least four cents a gallon.
It is hardly to be wondered at that when the oil men had before them the
full text of these contracts they refused absolutely to accept the
repeated assertions of the members of the South Improvement Company that
their scheme was intended only for “the good of the oil business.” The
committee of Congress could not be persuaded to believe it either. “Your
success meant the destruction of every refiner who refused for any
reason to join your company, or whom you did not care to have in, and it
put the producers entirely in your power. It would make a monopoly such
as no set of men are fit to handle,” the chairman of the committee
declared. Of course Mr. Warden, the secretary of the company, protested
again and again that they meant to take in all the refiners, but when he
had to admit that the contracts with the railroads were not made on this
condition, his protestations met with little credence. Besides, there
was the damning fact that no refiners had come in except those in
Cleveland, and that they with one accord testified that they had yielded
to force. Not a single factory in either New York or the Oil Regions was
in the combination. The fact that the producers had never been
approached in any way looked very bad for the company, too. Mr. Watson
affirmed and reaffirmed before the committee that it was the intention
of the company to take care of the producers. “It was an essential part
of this contract that the producers should join it,” he declared. But no
such condition was embodied in the contract. It was verbal only, and,
besides, it had never been submitted to the producers themselves in any
form until after the trouble in the Oil Regions began. The committee,
like the oil men, insisted that under the circumstances no such verbal
understanding was to be trusted.[21]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account