The History of the Thirty Years' WarSchiller, Friedrich
History
The History of the Thirty Years' War
Schiller, Friedrich
Europe -- History -- 1517-1648; Thirty Years' War, 1618-1648
army, and to make a worthy display of his great abilities, he was the
last who appeared in the field; and even then, it was an hereditary
province of Austria, which he selected as the seat of war.
Of all the Austrian provinces, Silesia was most exposed to danger. Three
different armies, a Swedish under Count Thurn, a Saxon under Arnheim and
the Duke of Lauenburg, and one of Brandenburg under Borgsdorf, had at
the same time carried the war into this country; they had already taken
possession of the most important places, and even Breslau had embraced
the cause of the allies. But this crowd of commanders and armies was the
very means of saving this province to the Emperor; for the jealousy of
the generals, and the mutual hatred of the Saxons and the Swedes, never
allowed them to act with unanimity. Arnheim and Thurn contended for the
chief command; the troops of Brandenburg and Saxony combined against the
Swedes, whom they looked upon as troublesome strangers who ought to be
got rid of as soon as possible. The Saxons, on the contrary, lived on
a very intimate footing with the Imperialists, and the officers of
both these hostile armies often visited and entertained each other. The
Imperialists were allowed to remove their property without hindrance,
and many did not affect to conceal that they had received large sums
from Vienna. Among such equivocal allies, the Swedes saw themselves sold
and betrayed; and any great enterprise was out of the question, while so
bad an understanding prevailed between the troops. General Arnheim, too,
was absent the greater part of the time; and when he at last returned,
Wallenstein was fast approaching the frontiers with a formidable force.
His army amounted to 40,000 men, while to oppose him the allies had only
24,000. They nevertheless resolved to give him battle, and marched to
Munsterberg, where he had formed an intrenched camp. But Wallenstein
remained inactive for eight days; he then left his intrenchments, and
marched slowly and with composure to the enemy's camp. But even after
quitting his position, and when the enemy, emboldened by his past
delay, manfully prepared to receive him, he declined the opportunity
of fighting. The caution with which he avoided a battle was imputed to
fear; but the well-established reputation of Wallenstein enabled him to
despise this suspicion. The vanity of the allies allowed them not to see
that he purposely saved them a defeat, because a victory at that time
would not have served his own ends. To convince them of his superior
power, and that his inactivity proceeded not from any fear of them, he
put to death the commander of a castle that fell into his hands, because
he had refused at once to surrender an untenable place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account