The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
Upon which passage Thomas Farnabie, the celebrated English scholar
(1575-1647) glosses thus: “He alludes to the office of the Haruspex who
used to inspect entrails & intestines. Pliny says: The entrails of the
toad (_Rana rubeta_), that is to say the tongue, tiny bones, gall, heart,
have rare virtue for they are used in many medicines and salves. Haply
he means the puddock or hop-toad, thus demonstrating that these animals
are not poisonous, their entrails being completely inefficacious in
confecting poisons.”[157] In 1610 Juan de Echalar, a sorcerer of Navarre,
confessed at his trial before the Alcantarine inquisitor Don Alonso
Becerra Holguin that he and his coven collected toads for the Sabbat,
and when they presented these animals to the Devil he blessed them with
his left hand, after which they were killed and cooked in a stewpot with
human bones and pieces of corpses rifled from new-made graves. From
this filthy hotch-potch were brewed poisons and unguents that the Devil
distributed to all present with directions how to use them. By sprinkling
corn with the liquid it was supposed they could blight a standing field,
and also destroy flowers and fruit. A few drops let fall upon a person’s
garments was believed to insure death, and a smear upon the shed or sty
effectually diseased cattle. From these crude superstitions the fantastic
stories of dancing toads, toads dressed _en cavalier_, and demon toads at
the Sabbat were easily evolved.
There is ample and continuous evidence that children, usually tender
babes who were as yet unbaptized, were sacrificed at the Sabbat. These
were often the witches’ own offspring, and since a witch not unseldom was
the midwife or wise-woman of a village she had exceptional opportunities
of stifling a child at birth as a non-Sabbatial victim to Satan. “There
are no persons who can do more cunning harm to the Catholic faith than
midwives,” says the _Malleus Maleficarum_, Pars I, q. xi: “_Nemo fidei
catholicæ amplius nocet quam obstetrices._” The classic examples of
child-sacrifice are those of Gilles de Rais (1440) and the abbé Guibourg
(1680). In the process against the former one hundred and forty children
are explicitly named: some authorities accept as many as eight hundred
victims. Their blood, brains, and bones were used to decoct magic
philtres. In the days of Guibourg the sacrifice of a babe at the impious
mass was so common that he generally paid not more than a crown-piece for
his victim. “Il avait acheté un écu l’enfant qui fut sacrifié à cette
messe.” (“The child sacrificed at this mass he had bought for a crown.”)
These abominable ceremonies were frequently performed at the instance of
Madame de Montespan in order that Louis XIV should always remain faithful
to her, should reject all other mistresses, repudiate his queen, and in
fine raise her to the throne.[158] The most general use was to cut the
throat of the child, whose blood was drained into the chalice and allowed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account