The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
Inasmuch as the discovery of the devil-mark was regarded as one of the
most convincing indications—if not, indeed, an infallible proof—that
the accused was guilty since he bore indelibly branded upon his flesh
Satan’s own sign-manual, it is easy to see how the searching for,
the recognition and the probing of, such marks actually grew to be a
profession in which not a few ingenious persons came to be recognized
as experts and practical authorities. In Scotland, especially, the
“prickers,” as they were called, formed a regular gild. They received a
good fee for every witch they discovered, and, as might be expected, they
did not fail to reap a golden harvest. At the trial of Janet Peaston,
in 1646, the magistrates of Dalkeith “caused John Kincaid of Tranent,
the common pricker, to exercise his craft upon her. He found two marks
of the Devil’s making; for she could not feel the pin when it was put
into either of the said marks, nor did the marks bleed when the pin was
taken out again. When she was asked where she thought the pins were
put into her, she pointed to a part of her body distant from the real
place. They were pins of three inches in length.”[60] Another notorious
pricker was John Bain, upon whose unsupported evidence a large number of
unfortunate wretches were sentenced to death. About 1634 John Balfour of
Corhouse was feared over all the countryside for his exploits; whilst
twenty years later one John Dick proved a rival to Kincaid himself. The
regular trade of these “common prickers” came to be a serious nuisance,
and confessedly opened the door to all sorts of roguery. The following
extraordinary incident shows how dangerous and villainous in mountebank
hands the examinations could become, which, if conducted at all, ought
at least to be safeguarded by every precaution and only entrusted to
skilled physicians, who should report the result to grave and learned
divines. “There came then to Inverness one Mr. Paterson, who had run
over the kingdom for triall off witches, and was ordinarily called the
Pricker, because his way of triall was with a long brass pin. Stripping
them naked, he alledged that the spell spot was seen and discovered.
After rubbing over the whole body with his palms he slips in the pin,
and, it seemes, with shame and fear being dasht, they felt it not, but
he left it in the flesh, deep to the head, and desired them to find and
take it out. It is sure some witches were discovered but many honest men
and women were blotted and break by this trick. In Elgin there were two
killed; in Forres two; and one Margret Duff, a rank witch, burned in
Inverness. This Paterson came up to the Church of Wardlaw, and within
the church pricked 14 women and one man brought thither by the Chisholm
of Commer, and 4 brought by Andrew Fraser, chamerlan of Ferrintosh. He
first polled all their heads and amassed the heap of haire together,
hid in the stone dich, and so proceeded to pricking.[61] Severall of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account