Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Your committee are of the opinion that while a few intelligent
women, such as appeared before the committee in advocacy of the
pending measure, would defy all obstacles in the way of their
casting the ballot, yet the great mass of the intelligent,
refined and judicious, with the becoming modesty of their sex,
would shrink from the rude contact of the crowd and, with the
exceptions mentioned, leave the ignorant and vile the exclusive
right to speak for the gentler sex in public affairs.
[This opinion has been wholly disproved by the experience of States
where women do vote. The "intelligent and judicious" have learned that
there is more "rude contact" in going to the market, the theater, the
train and the ferry-boat, than in a quiet booth where no man is
permitted to come within a hundred feet. But women are not so "modest
and refined" as to shrink from "rude contact" even, if it would give
them the opportunity to control the conditions which surround and
influence their husbands, their children, their homes and their
community.]
Your committee are of the opinion that the general policy of
female suffrage should remain in abeyance, in so far as the
general Government is concerned, until the States and communities
directly chargeable under our system of government with the
exercise and regulation of this privilege, shall put the seal of
affirmation upon it; and there certainly can be no reason for an
amendment of the Constitution to settle a question within the
jurisdiction of the States, and which they should first settle
for themselves.
[Of course, according to this logic, after the States settle the
question and put the seal of affirmation on it, then the general
Government will take a hand!]
This House Report (No. 1330) was not drastic enough to suit the Hon.
Luke P. Poland (Vt.), so he made his own, in which he said:
No government founded upon the principle that sovereignty resides
in the people has ever allowed all the people to vote, or to
directly participate in making or administering the laws.
Suffrage has never been regarded as the natural right of all the
people or of any particular class or portion of the people.
Suffrage is representation, and it has been given in free
governments to such class of persons as in their judgment [whose
judgment?] would fairly and safely represent the rights and
interests of the whole. The right has generally, if not
universally, been conferred on men above twenty-one years of age,
and often this has been restricted by requiring the ownership of
property or the payment of taxes. [Which?]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account