Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
No question in this country has been more ably discussed than
this has been by the women themselves. I do not think a single
objection which is made to woman suffrage is tenable. No one will
contend but that women have sufficient capacity to vote
intelligently. Sacred and profane history is full of the records
of great deeds by women. They have ruled kingdoms, and, my friend
from Georgia to the contrary notwithstanding, they have commanded
armies. They have excelled in statecraft, they have shone in
literature, and, rising superior to their environments and
breaking the shackles with which custom and tyranny have bound
them, they have stood side by side with men in the fields of the
arts and the sciences.
If it were a fact that woman is intellectually inferior to man,
which I do not admit, still that would be no reason why she
should not be permitted to participate in the formation and
control of the government to which she owes allegiance. If we are
to have as a test for the exercise of the right of suffrage a
qualification based upon intelligence, let it be applied to women
and to men alike. If it be admitted that suffrage is a right,
that is the end of controversy; there can no longer be any
argument made against woman suffrage; because, if it is her
right, then, if there were but one poor woman in all the United
States demanding the right it would be tyranny to refuse the
demand.
But our opponents say that suffrage is not a right; that it is a
matter of grace only; that it is a privilege which is conferred
upon or withheld from individual members of society by society at
pleasure. Society as here used means man's government, and the
proposition assumes that men have a right to institute and
control governments for themselves and for women. I admit that in
the governments of the world, past and present, men as a rule
have assumed to be the ruling class; that they have instituted
governments from participation in which they have excluded women;
that they have made laws for themselves and for women, and have
themselves administered them. But, that the provisions conferring
or regulating suffrage, in the constitutions and laws of
governments so constituted, have determined the question of the
_right_ of suffrage, can not be maintained.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account