Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Mrs. Virginia L. Minor (Mo.) addressed the convention on The Law of
Federal Suffrage, a legal argument on the right to vote conferred by
the Constitution. Miss Anthony supplemented Mrs. Minor's argument with
a history of the Fourteenth Amendment, in which she said:
When that Fourteenth Amendment was under discussion--when it was
proposed to put the word "male" into the second section--it read:
"If any State shall disfranchise any of its citizens on account
of color, all of that class shall be counted out of the basis of
representation." But there were timid souls on the floor of
Congress at the close of the war, as well as at other periods of
our history, and to prevent the enfranchisement of women by this
amendment they moved to make it read: "If any State shall
disfranchise any of its _male_ citizens, all of that class shall
be counted out of the basis of representation." Male citizens!
For the first time in the history of our Government that
discriminating adjective was placed in the Constitution, and yet
the men on the floor of Congress, from Charles Sumner down, all
declared that this amendment would not in any wise change the
status of women!
We at once asserted our right to vote under this amendment: "All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to
the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and
of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce
any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
citizens of the United States." Our first trial was on civil
rights, when Mrs. Myra Bradwell of Chicago, who had been for some
time publishing a law journal which every lawyer in the State
said he could not afford to do without, applied for admission to
the bar, and these same lawyers denied it. She appealed to the
Illinois Supreme Court and it confirmed the denial, because she
was not only a woman but a married woman. Then she appealed her
case to the Supreme Court of the United States, and a majority of
this court decided that the right to be a lawyer was not
especially a citizen's right and that therefore the State of
Illinois could legally abridge the privileges and immunities of
its women by denying them admission to the bar.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account