Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Paternalism in government, which seeks to do good to the people
against their will, is wrong in the Czar of Russia and in old
King George, but is quite right and just when it affects only our
wives, sisters and daughters! They have everything they need, why
ask the ballot? Ah, my friends, so long as they have not the
right to determine the thing they need, so long as the ultimate
sovereignty remains with men to say what is good and what is bad
for them, they are deprived of that which we, as men, esteem the
most precious of all rights. I suppose there never was a time
when men did not believe that women had everything they ought to
want; that they had as much as was good for them. The woman must
obey in consideration of the kind protection which her lord
vouchsafes to her. The wife's property ought to belong to the
husband, because upon him the law casts the burden of sustaining
the family. There must be a ruler, and the husband ought to be
that one. But this is the same principle which, during thousands
of years, maintained the divine right of kings. When we apply it
to our system of suffrage the number of sovereigns is increased,
that is all. It is a recognition of the divine right of man to
legislate for himself and woman too. It is only a difference in
the number of autocrats and the manner in which their decrees are
promulgated....
By what argument can a man defend his own suffrage as a right and
not concede an equal right to woman? A just man ought to accord
to every other human being, even his own wife, the rights which
he demands himself.
"But she has her sphere and she ought not go beyond it." My
friend, who gave you the right to determine what that sphere
should be? If nature prescribes it, nature will carry out her own
ordinances without your prohibitory legislation. I have the
greatest contempt for the sort of legislation which seeks to
enable nature to carry out her own immutable laws. I would have
very little respect for any decree, enacted with whatever
solemnity, which should prescribe that an object shall fall
towards the earth and not from it; and I have just as little
respect for any statute of man which enacts that women shall
continue to love and care for their children by shutting them out
from political action and preferment lest they should neglect the
duties of the household....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account