Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
MRS. PARK: I suppose it is true that all through history
individual women have been able, sometimes by cajolery, sometimes
by personal charm, sometimes by force of character, to get for
themselves privileges far greater than any that the most radical
advocates of woman's rights have yet demanded. But in the case of
Miss Anthony and the other early suffragists all that force of
character was turned not to individual ends, not to getting large
things for themselves, but to getting little gains, step by step,
for the great mass of other women; not for the service of
themselves but for the service of the sex and so of the whole
human race.... The object of the College Women's League is to
bring the question of equal suffrage to college women, to help
them realize their debt to the women who have worked so hard for
them and to make them understand that one of the ways to pay that
debt is to fight the battle in the quarter of the field in which
it is still unwon; in short, to make them feel the obligation of
opportunity.
PRESIDENT THOMAS: In the year 1903 there were in the United
States 6,474 women studying in women's colleges and 24,863 women
studying in co-educational colleges. If the annual rate of
increase has continued the same, as it undoubtedly has, during
the past three years, there are in college at the present time
38,268 women students. Although there are in the United States
nearly 1,800,000 less women than men, women already constitute
considerably over one-third of the entire student body and are
steadily gaining on men. This means that in another generation or
two one-half of all the people who have been to college in the
United States will be women; and, just as surely as the seasons
of the year succeed one another or the law of gravitation works,
just so surely will this great body of educated women wish to use
their trained intelligence in making the towns, cities and States
of their country better places for themselves and their children
to live in; just so surely will the men with whom they have
worked side by side in college classes claim and receive their
aid in political as well as home life. The logic of events does
not lie. It is unthinkable that women who have learned to act for
themselves in college and have become awakened there to civic
duties should not care for the ballot to enforce their wishes.
[Illustration: PIONEERS OF WOMAN SUFFRAGE.
ELIZABETH CADY STANTON. Born, 1815.
LUCY STONE. Born, 1818.
SUSAN B. ANTHONY. Born, 1820.
LUCRETIA MOTT. Born, 1793.
MILLICENT GARRETT FAWCETT Born, 1846.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account