Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee, this is the
seventeenth Congress that has been addressed by the women of this
nation, which means that we have been coming to Congress
thirty-four years. Once, in 1887, the Senate brought the measure
to a discussion and vote and defeated it by 34 to 16, with 26 not
wishing to go on record. We ask for a 16th Amendment because it
is much easier to persuade the members of a Legislature to ratify
this amendment than it is to get the whole three million or six
million, as the case may be, of the rank and file of the men of
the State to vote for woman suffrage. We think we are of as much
importance as the Filipinos, Porto Ricans, Hawaiians, Cubans and
all of the different sorts of men that you are carefully
considering. The six hundred teachers sent over to the
Philippines are a thousand times better entitled to vote than are
the men who go there to make money. The women of the islands are
quite as well qualified to govern and have charge of affairs as
are the men. I do not propose to talk. I am simply here to
introduce those who are to address you.
Miss Anthony then presented Miss Harriet May Mills (N. Y.), who spoke
from the standpoint of tax paying women, who in the towns and villages
alone of her State paid taxes on over $5,000,000 worth of property;
Mrs. Lucretia L. Blankenburg, president of the Pennsylvania Suffrage
Association, who showed the connection between politics and conditions
in Philadelphia; the Rev. Olympia Brown, president of the Wisconsin
association, who pointed out the need of both the reason and the
intuition in the country to govern it wisely. Mrs. Mariana W. Chapman,
president of the New York association, called for a Federal Amendment
to enfranchise women because of the principles on which this
Government was founded. Miss Gail Laughlin, a graduate of Wellesley
College and Cornell University Law School, made a strong argument on
the effect enfranchisement would have on woman's economic independence
and greater efficiency. Mrs. Jennie A. Brown, of Minneapolis, told of
the unlimited opportunities allowed to the women of the great
northwest which were largely counteracted by their political
restrictions. Mrs. Mary Wood Swift of California, president of the
National Council of Women, declared that the countless thousands of
the educated, developed women of today were fully equal to the
responsibilities of citizenship. Mrs. Lucy Hobart Day, president of
the Maine association, demonstrated the inferior and unfortunate
position of disfranchised women. Miss Alice Stone Blackwell, editor of
the _Woman's Journal_ (Boston), indicated how every step of the
progress of women had been opposed by the same objections now made to
woman suffrage and submitted these objections and the answers to them
in a convincing statement which filled ten pages of the printed report
of the hearing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account