The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless ManAnderson, Nels
General
The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man
Anderson, Nels
Chicago (Ill.) -- Social conditions; Tramps
Charges are even made that tramps and hobos sell their votes, that
they often engage in “repeating.” There is not as much ground for
such charges as one would expect. The average tramp does not have
the courage to take the chances that the “repeater” must expect
to run. He realizes also that he is always under more or less
suspicion even when he is going straight, and this serves as a
brake.
Homeless men as a group make much of the fact that they are
excluded from the ballot, and they remind all who have the patience
to listen that the exclusion is unjust because they perform an
important and legitimate function in the labor world. They seem to
protest against their exclusion more than to demand the ballot. One
man said that he did not know if he would vote if he had a chance,
“but it’s the principle of the thing.”
The International Brotherhood Welfare Association has repeatedly
stood for some form of universal suffrage that would permit
migratory workers to vote, regardless of the length of their
residence in a community.
During the latter part of May, 1922, a convention of the
Farmer-Labor Party was held in Chicago. Certain members of
the hobo group failed in the attempt to get a resolution
through the convention in favor of giving the vote to
migratory workers. Certain delegates feared that the
hobo was too irresponsible to use the ballot. The farmer
element in the Farmer-Labor Party resented the idea of
giving support to the tramp group by whom they had been
harassed so much in the harvest fields. Nor is the I.W.W.
particularly interested in “votes for the hobos,” because
in their opinion the ballot is at best an indirect method
of accomplishing what can be easier secured by direct
action.
Forty-eight of the 400 homeless men studied by the writer claimed
to have voted in the presidential election of 1920.
56. One of the men interviewed in this study said: “I
happened to drop into Salt Lake the last day of the
registration so I got my name on the dotted line. I swore I
had been in the state a year. They couldn’t prove I wasn’t,
so it passed. I’d been in ten or fifteen states that year.
Well, when election came I was working in Bingham. My boss
was short of help and didn’t want me to lay off to vote,
so I quit and went to Salt Lake. Got there just before the
polls closed.”
One man said that he beat his way 1,000 miles to cast his ballot.
Most of the 48, however, had voted because at election time they
were living in or near their legal residence. What was the attitude
of the 352 who did not vote? The following are the reasons given
(with reference to 1920 election):[56]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account