The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless ManAnderson, Nels
General
The Hobo: The Sociology of the Homeless Man
Anderson, Nels
Chicago (Ill.) -- Social conditions; Tramps
Just how much education the Hobohemian proletariat gets from this
speaking and reading is not easily estimated. They learn something
about the class struggle, industrial organization, and politics.
Sometimes an observation on science or literature or art will
fall from a speaker’s lips, but most of these observations are
new only to the stranger in the class. The old-timer, however,
hears only old ideas restated; or, at best, new facts and figures
interpreted to support old ideas. It is like a game with a limited
number of pieces and a limited number of moves. Sometimes, to
be sure, a speaker endeavors to serve “science” to the “floating
fraternity.” Lectures on biology, psychology, sociology, or
economics may be heard any evening or holiday during the summer.
Most of these lectures go over the heads of the audience, and it
is questionable whether the speakers have sufficient background to
speak intelligently of the sciences they are attempting to expound.
This effort to educate the proletariat is, nevertheless, not
altogether without results. It gives men something to occupy their
minds. It gives them some understanding of their common interests;
creates a certain amount of solidarity and, perhaps, best of all,
“kills time.” Some speakers realize this and declare that the soap
box is primarily a kind of entertainment. One man makes it a point
to try to amuse his crowd as well as to “instruct” them. “You’ve
got to keep ’em interested. You have to amuse them and make ’em
laugh before you can get any ideas into their heads. Whenever
things get dry, I leave an opening for a drunk or someone to ask me
a question or crack a joke, and interest picks up again.”
AN AFTERNOON SERIES OF SOAP-BOX ORATIONS
60. During a Sunday in July, 1922, no less than twenty men
spoke on the box at the corner of Jefferson and Madison
streets; and as many topics were treated. In the afternoon
the following speakers shared the time:
1. The meeting was opened by a man who borrowed a box from
a nearby fruit stand. He tried to get another man to speak
first so that he would not have to hurt his voice gathering
the crowd, but no one cared to start. He talked for twenty
minutes about graft in the patent-medicine trade. He had
a very catchy speech well tempered with humor and he
gathered a big crowd. Evidently he had made a study of the
patent-medicine business and his speech was an “exposure”
of the game. He finished by selling some pamphlets dealing
with the subject.
2. The second speaker was an I.W.W. who talked for fifteen
minutes on education. He was a good talker and held the
crowd. He wound up by selling some I.W.W. literature
and periodicals in which the thoughts of economists had
been reduced from the difficult academic language to the
understanding of the man on the street. He also passed out
some literature, i.e., old issues of the _Solidarity_, and
I.W.W. papers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account