In tragedy, whose subject was usually legend, but which also dealt with
questions of the day, such as the occupation of Miletus and the wars
with the Persians, there was at first a distinct preponderance of the
lyric element supplied by the chorus over the purely dramatic part.
Before the time of Aeschylus there was little idea of dramatic
treatment; at that time there was only a single actor who, together with
the chorus, supplied the whole action, and confined himself chiefly to
recitations, so that there could be no question of striking situations
and dialogue. Aeschylus then introduced a second actor; and as these
actors, by a change of dress, could undertake several parts, the action
was enlarged and animated, and the dialogue grew more interesting. When
Sophocles added a third actor--an innovation of which Aeschylus, too,
made use in his later period, and which constituted the highest number
ever used in the Greek drama--the victory of the dramatic part over the
lyric was accomplished; and from that time onward the chorus sank in
importance compared with the actors, and at last disappeared altogether.
In the tragedies of Euripides the dramatic element had become so
important that the chorus could really be dispensed with; true,
Euripides could not venture entirely to discard this custom, which was
sanctified by religion and tradition, but, by gradually diminishing the
share of the chorus in the action, he prepared for its complete
abandonment. In Aeschylus, therefore, the solemn songs and reflections
of the chorus occupy a considerable space, and the chorus even sometimes
takes an active part in the action, since it preponderates in the play,
and may be regarded as an acting personage; in Euripides its presence is
more accidental--it expounds the dogmas and opinions of the poet, but
takes no part in the action, and in tragedies it might be entirely left
out without injury. In Sophocles alone the chorus and dialogue are
harmoniously balanced. Corresponding to these changes in the position of
the chorus was the amount assigned to them for declamation. We may say
in general that the chorus sang an entrance song (πάροδος), and
afterwards during the further course of the play choric songs to mark
pauses in the action, accompanied by marching, but without leaving the
orchestra, and these were called standing songs (στάσιμα); these long
odes divided the drama into a series of parts, called episodes
(ἐπεισόδια), which may be compared to our acts, since the action stops
during the song, and the spectator has time to collect himself and to
let what he has heard and seen act upon him, while the song continued
through the interval helps him to keep the impression produced by the
action, or else prepares him for what is to follow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account