This innovation was necessitated by the fact that
the number of rich families of whom these pecuniary sacrifices could be
demanded, had become very small, and these now supplied the presidents.
This change in the arrangements of the choragia seems to have taken
place under the rule of Demetrius of Phalerum, towards the end of the
fourth century B.C.
It is a well-known fact that in the ancient theatre women never appeared
on the stage, and all women’s parts were presented by men; we have also
noted the fact that there was at first only a single actor, who
represented various parts one after another, and entered into a dialogue
with the leader of the chorus, and that Aeschylus added a second, and
Sophocles a third. Originally the poet himself appeared as actor, and
when there were several actors, as protagonist--that is he represented
the chief part. When Sophocles, who had himself appeared a few times,
abandoned this custom, it gradually fell into disuse, and the first
actor, as well as the two others, was supplied to the poet by the State.
As a rule, the actors were allotted to the poets by lot; it seems,
however, that before the State undertook to pay an actor, he had to
submit to examination, and that only those who had already appeared, and
whose performances were well known, were excluded from this examination.
The State, then, engaged for each festival a number of protagonists,
deuteragonists, and tritagonists, corresponding to the number of poets
contending; thus, if there were three poets competing, they required
nine actors, supposing the same actors continued to perform throughout
the whole tetralogy, of which we cannot be certain. The lot assigned to
each of the poets one out of the three classes; still, we know that some
poets always had the same protagonist, who appeared in all their plays,
and for whom, in fact, they sometimes wrote a special part; therefore,
it must have been customary for poets who had already been victorious to
ask for a particular protagonist without drawing lots, and this custom
probably became the rule afterwards. We cannot, however, say how the two
others were chosen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account